TY - JOUR
T1 - Diffusion tensor imaging reveals microstructural differences between subtypes of trigeminal neuralgia
AU - Willsey, Matthew S.
AU - Collins, Kelly L.
AU - Conrad, Erin C.
AU - Chubb, Heather A.
AU - Patil, Parag G.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Nancy A. Dudek and Hemant A. Parmar, who contributed to preliminary versions of this work. We also thank Matthew Leach for technical assistance. The A. Alfred Taubman Medical Research Institute (to P.G.P.) and the Griswold and Margery H. Ruth–Alpha Omega Alpha Student Research Fellowship Award (to K.L.C.) supported this work. We are grateful to Tom Cichonski for his editorial comments.
Publisher Copyright:
©AANS 2020, except where prohibited by US copyright law
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an uncommon idiopathic facial pain syndrome. To assist in diagnosis, treatment, and research, TN is often classified as type 1 (TN1) when pain is primarily paroxysmal and episodic or type 2 (TN2) when pain is primarily constant in character. Recently, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has revealed microstructural changes in the symptomatic trigeminal root and root entry zone of patients with unilateral TN. In this study, the authors explored the differences in DTI parameters between subcategories of TN, specifically TN1 and TN2, in the pontine segment of the trigeminal tract. METHODS The authors enrolled 8 patients with unilateral TN1, 7 patients with unilateral TN2, and 23 asymptomatic controls. Patients underwent DTI with parameter measurements in a region of interest within the pontine segment of the trigeminal tract. DTI parameters were compared between groups. RESULTS In the pontine segment, the radial diffusivity (p = 0.0049) and apparent diffusion coefficient (p = 0.023) values in TN1 patients were increased compared to the values in TN2 patients and controls. The DTI measures in TN2 were not statistically significant from those in controls. When comparing the symptomatic to asymptomatic sides in TN1 patients, radial diffusivity was increased (p = 0.025) and fractional anisotropy was decreased (p = 0.044) in the symptomatic sides. The apparent diffusion coefficient was increased, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS Noninvasive DTI analysis of patients with TN may lead to improved diagnosis of TN subtypes (e.g., TN1 and TN2) and improve patient selection for surgical intervention. DTI measurements may also provide insights into prognosis after intervention, as TN1 patients are known to have better surgical outcomes than TN2 patients.
AB - OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an uncommon idiopathic facial pain syndrome. To assist in diagnosis, treatment, and research, TN is often classified as type 1 (TN1) when pain is primarily paroxysmal and episodic or type 2 (TN2) when pain is primarily constant in character. Recently, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has revealed microstructural changes in the symptomatic trigeminal root and root entry zone of patients with unilateral TN. In this study, the authors explored the differences in DTI parameters between subcategories of TN, specifically TN1 and TN2, in the pontine segment of the trigeminal tract. METHODS The authors enrolled 8 patients with unilateral TN1, 7 patients with unilateral TN2, and 23 asymptomatic controls. Patients underwent DTI with parameter measurements in a region of interest within the pontine segment of the trigeminal tract. DTI parameters were compared between groups. RESULTS In the pontine segment, the radial diffusivity (p = 0.0049) and apparent diffusion coefficient (p = 0.023) values in TN1 patients were increased compared to the values in TN2 patients and controls. The DTI measures in TN2 were not statistically significant from those in controls. When comparing the symptomatic to asymptomatic sides in TN1 patients, radial diffusivity was increased (p = 0.025) and fractional anisotropy was decreased (p = 0.044) in the symptomatic sides. The apparent diffusion coefficient was increased, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS Noninvasive DTI analysis of patients with TN may lead to improved diagnosis of TN subtypes (e.g., TN1 and TN2) and improve patient selection for surgical intervention. DTI measurements may also provide insights into prognosis after intervention, as TN1 patients are known to have better surgical outcomes than TN2 patients.
KW - Diffusion tensor imaging
KW - Facial pain
KW - Trigeminal neuralgia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090346225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090346225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2019.4.JNS19299
DO - 10.3171/2019.4.JNS19299
M3 - Article
C2 - 31323635
AN - SCOPUS:85090346225
SN - 0022-3085
VL - 133
SP - 573
EP - 579
JO - Journal of neurosurgery
JF - Journal of neurosurgery
IS - 2
ER -