Digital photography in the evaluation and management of female patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: A standardized protocol for quality improvement

Introduction: Digital photography can be securely stored in the medical record and enhance documentation of physical exam findings and monitor wound healing. A standardized protocol that respects the dignity of the patient and maintains the fidelity of objective documentation is needed for patients with differences in sexual development (DSD) and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and applications of a HIPAA-compliant digital photography protocol in the care of female patients with CAH. Study design: A protocol for standardized digital imaging including consent, permission, data capture, and storage in the electronic medical record (EMR) was implemented. Patients undergoing physical examination during multidisciplinary CAH clinic visits, preoperative evaluation, and postoperative follow-up from October 2020 through May 2021 were included. Male patients with CAH, patients with clitoromegaly or urogenital sinus not from CAH, and patients seen through telehealth were excluded. Consent was obtained from caregivers and permission from patients. Images of the exam were taken during clinic visits or at the time of surgery with no identifying features included. Images were directly uploaded into the patient's chart in the HIPAA-protected EMR separate from other clinical documentation and not stored on personal devices. Results: There were 17 patients with CAH seen with median age 6 years (range 2 weeks–18 years). There was a median of 3 photos per patient during the study period with cooperation from both the patient and their caregiver. Amongst the patients seen, 6 patients underwent reconstruction with a median of 10 photos per patient. Images were available and used for preoperative planning and counseling. Patients with previous images did not require repeat examinations and were subjected to fewer genital examinations. Fewer providers were present during exams. Images taken by providers and caregivers during the postoperative period were used to monitor wound healing and surgical outcomes. Discussion: Protocol implementation improved patient care by reducing the number of exams and number of providers present, enhancing clinical documentation, and providing a means of tracking the physical exam over time. This was in concordance with guidelines for limiting exams for patients with DSD and CAH. Implementation of best practices for medical photography was important in respecting patient dignity and confidentiality. Conclusion: Implementation of standardized digital photography was feasible and acceptable to patients and caregivers. Digital images reduced the need for repeat physical examination and provided a visual means of enhancing clinical documentation.