TY - JOUR
T1 - Discussion and Initiation of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Were Rare Following Diagnoses of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Veterans
AU - Kobayashi, Takaaki
AU - Van Epps, Puja
AU - Maier, Marissa M.
AU - Beste, Lauren A.
AU - Beck, Brice F.
AU - Alexander, Bruce
AU - Ohl, Michael E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background: Healthcare encounters for the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common and represent an opportunity to discuss and initiate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Little is known about how frequently PrEP is discussed and initiated in association with encounters for STIs. Design: Retrospective cohort and nested case-control study, matched by STI date, in national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities from January 2013 to December 2018. Participants: Veterans with a first STI diagnosis (i.e., early syphilis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia) based on ICD codes, excluding those with prior HIV diagnosis, prior PrEP use, or STI diagnosed on screening during a visit to initiate PrEP. Main Measures: Frequency of PrEP initiation within 90 days of healthcare encounter for STIs. In the case-control study, we performed a structured chart review from the initial STI-related clinical encounter and quantified frequency of PrEP discussions among matched patients who did and did not initiate PrEP in the following 90 days. Key Results: We identified 23,312 patients with a first STI, of whom 90 (0.4%) started PrEP within 90 days. PrEP initiation was associated with urban residence (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 1.8–13.5), White compared to Black race (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–2.7), and syphilis diagnosis (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 3.7–8.6). Chart review revealed that discussion of PrEP was rare among people with STIs who did not subsequently start PrEP (1.1%, 95% CI 0.1–4.0). PrEP initiation was associated with documentation of sexual history (80.0% of initiators vs. 51.0% of non-initiators, p < 0.01) and discussion of PrEP (52.2% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01) during the initial STI diagnosis encounter. Conclusions: Discussion and initiation of PrEP were rare following healthcare encounters for STIs. Interventions are needed to improve low rates of sexual history-taking and discussion of PrEP during healthcare encounters for STIs.
AB - Background: Healthcare encounters for the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common and represent an opportunity to discuss and initiate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Little is known about how frequently PrEP is discussed and initiated in association with encounters for STIs. Design: Retrospective cohort and nested case-control study, matched by STI date, in national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities from January 2013 to December 2018. Participants: Veterans with a first STI diagnosis (i.e., early syphilis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia) based on ICD codes, excluding those with prior HIV diagnosis, prior PrEP use, or STI diagnosed on screening during a visit to initiate PrEP. Main Measures: Frequency of PrEP initiation within 90 days of healthcare encounter for STIs. In the case-control study, we performed a structured chart review from the initial STI-related clinical encounter and quantified frequency of PrEP discussions among matched patients who did and did not initiate PrEP in the following 90 days. Key Results: We identified 23,312 patients with a first STI, of whom 90 (0.4%) started PrEP within 90 days. PrEP initiation was associated with urban residence (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 1.8–13.5), White compared to Black race (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–2.7), and syphilis diagnosis (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 3.7–8.6). Chart review revealed that discussion of PrEP was rare among people with STIs who did not subsequently start PrEP (1.1%, 95% CI 0.1–4.0). PrEP initiation was associated with documentation of sexual history (80.0% of initiators vs. 51.0% of non-initiators, p < 0.01) and discussion of PrEP (52.2% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01) during the initial STI diagnosis encounter. Conclusions: Discussion and initiation of PrEP were rare following healthcare encounters for STIs. Interventions are needed to improve low rates of sexual history-taking and discussion of PrEP during healthcare encounters for STIs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111647474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111647474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-021-07034-7
DO - 10.1007/s11606-021-07034-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 34341917
AN - SCOPUS:85111647474
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 37
SP - 2482
EP - 2488
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 10
ER -