TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of S. mutans biofilm on the hybrid ceramic-resin cement bond strength assessed by different methods
AU - Mushashe, Amanda Mahammad
AU - de Almeida, Sarah Aquino
AU - Ferracane, Jack Libório
AU - Merritt, Justin
AU - Gonzaga, Carla Castiglia
AU - Correr, Gisele Maria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© (2023), (Piracicaba Dental School - UNICAMP). All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the biofilm effect on the hybrid ceramic-resin cement bond strength (BS) by comparing two methods. Methods: Teeth were distributed into groups (n=5), according to the resin cement (Maxcem Elite-(MC) or NX3 Nexus-(NX)) and degradation method (24h or 7 days in distilled water; 7 or 30 days incubated with biofilm and 30 days in sterile media). Treated surfaces of Vita Enamic blocks (5x6x7mm) were luted to treated or no treated dentin surfaces and light-cured. After 24h, beams were obtained (1x1x10mm) and stored accordingly. The flexural bond strength (FBS) was assessed by four-point bending test. Additional beams were obtained from new teeth (n=5), stored for 24h or 7 days in distilled water, and submitted to a microtensile bond strength (μTBS) assay. Failure modes were determined by scanning electron microscopy (100X). The flexure strength of the cements (n=10) was assessed by a four-point bending test. Data were analyzed by 1 and 2-ways ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between the degradation methods for the FBS groups. For the μTBS, the significant difference was as follows: NX 7days?> NX 24h?> MC 7days = MC 24h. Failure mode was mainly adhesive and mixed, but with an increase of cohesive within cement and pre-failures for the MC groups assessed by μTBS. NX had better performance than MC, regardless of the method. Conclusions: The biofilm had no effect on the materials BS and FBS test was a useful method to evaluate BS of materials with poor performance.
AB - Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the biofilm effect on the hybrid ceramic-resin cement bond strength (BS) by comparing two methods. Methods: Teeth were distributed into groups (n=5), according to the resin cement (Maxcem Elite-(MC) or NX3 Nexus-(NX)) and degradation method (24h or 7 days in distilled water; 7 or 30 days incubated with biofilm and 30 days in sterile media). Treated surfaces of Vita Enamic blocks (5x6x7mm) were luted to treated or no treated dentin surfaces and light-cured. After 24h, beams were obtained (1x1x10mm) and stored accordingly. The flexural bond strength (FBS) was assessed by four-point bending test. Additional beams were obtained from new teeth (n=5), stored for 24h or 7 days in distilled water, and submitted to a microtensile bond strength (μTBS) assay. Failure modes were determined by scanning electron microscopy (100X). The flexure strength of the cements (n=10) was assessed by a four-point bending test. Data were analyzed by 1 and 2-ways ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between the degradation methods for the FBS groups. For the μTBS, the significant difference was as follows: NX 7days?> NX 24h?> MC 7days = MC 24h. Failure mode was mainly adhesive and mixed, but with an increase of cohesive within cement and pre-failures for the MC groups assessed by μTBS. NX had better performance than MC, regardless of the method. Conclusions: The biofilm had no effect on the materials BS and FBS test was a useful method to evaluate BS of materials with poor performance.
KW - Biofilms
KW - Dental bonding
KW - Resin cements
KW - Tensile strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172358389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85172358389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8669389
DO - 10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8669389
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85172358389
SN - 1677-3225
VL - 22
JO - Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
JF - Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
M1 - e239389
ER -