Efficacy and Safety of Acoramidis in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

Julian D. Gillmore, Daniel P. Judge, Francesco Cappelli, Marianna Fontana, Pablo Garcia-Pavia, Simon Gibbs, Martha Grogan, Mazen Hanna, James Hoffman, Ahmad Masri, Mathew S. Maurer, Jose Nativi-Nicolau, Laura Obici, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Frank Rockhold, Keyur B. Shah, Prem Soman, Jyotsna Garg, Karen Chiswell, Haolin XuXiaofan Cao, Ted Lystig, Uma Sinha, Jonathan C. Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is characterized by the deposition of misfolded monomeric transthyretin (TTR) in the heart. Acoramidis is a high-affinity TTR stabilizer that acts to inhibit dissociation of tetrameric TTR and leads to more than 90% stabilization across the dosing interval as measured ex vivo. METHODS In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in a 2:1 ratio to receive acoramidis hydrochloride at a dose of 800 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 30 months. Efficacy was assessed in the patients who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area. The four-step primary hierarchical analysis included death from any cause, cardiovascular-related hospitalization, the change from baseline in the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, and the change from baseline in the 6-minute walk distance. We used the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method to compare all potential pairs of patients within strata to generate a P value. Key secondary outcomes were death from any cause, the 6-minute walk distance, the score on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary, and the serum TTR level. RESULTS A total of 632 patients underwent randomization. The primary analysis favored acoramidis over placebo (P<0.001); the corresponding win ratio was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 2.2), with 63.7% of pairwise comparisons favoring acoramidis and 35.9% favoring placebo. Together, death from any cause and cardiovascular- related hospitalization contributed more than half the wins and losses to the win ratio (58% of all pairwise comparisons); NT-proBNP pairwise comparisons yielded the highest ratio of wins to losses (23.3% vs. 7.0%). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in the acoramidis group and the placebo group (98.1% and 97.6%, respectively); serious adverse events were reported in 54.6% and 64.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, the receipt of acoramidis resulted in a significantly better four-step primary hierarchical outcome containing components of mortality, morbidity, and function than placebo. Adverse events were similar in the two groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-142
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume390
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 11 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Safety of Acoramidis in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this