TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrical risk score beyond the left ventricular ejection fraction
T2 - Prediction of sudden cardiac death in the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
AU - Aro, Aapo L.
AU - Reinier, Kyndaron
AU - Rusinaru, Carmen
AU - Uy-Evanado, Audrey
AU - Darouian, Navid
AU - Phan, Derek
AU - Mack, Wendy J.
AU - Jui, Jonathan
AU - Soliman, Elsayed Z.
AU - Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
AU - Chugh, Sumeet S.
N1 - Funding Information:
National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grants (R01HL122492 and R01HL126938 to S.S.C.). S.S.C. holds the Pauline and Harold Price Chair in Cardiac Electrophysiology at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles. A.L.A. is funded by grants from the Paavo Nurmi Foundation, the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, the Orion Research Foundation and the Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation. L.G.T. was supported by R01HL118277. The ARIC Study is carried out as a collaborative study
Publisher Copyright:
© Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2017/10/21
Y1 - 2017/10/21
N2 - Aims There is an urgent need to extend sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification beyond the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We evaluated whether a cumulative electrocardiogram (ECG) risk score would improve identification of individuals at high risk of SCD. Methods and results In the community-based Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study (catchment population 1/41 million), 522 SCD cases with archived 12-lead ECG available (65.3 ± 14.5 years, 66% male) were compared with 736 geographical controls to assess the incremental value of multiple ECG parameters in SCD prediction. Heart rate, LV hypertrophy, QRS transition zone, QRS-T angle, QTc, and Tpeak-to-Tend interval remained significant in the final model, which was externally validated in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Sixteen percent of cases and 3% of controls had ≥4 abnormal ECG markers. After adjusting for clinical factors and LVEF, increasing ECG risk score was associated with progressively greater odds of SCD. Overall, subjects with ≥4 ECG abnormalities had an odds ratio (OR) of 21.2 for SCD [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.4-47.7; P < 0.001]. In the LVEF >35% subgroup, the OR was 26.1 (95% CI 9.9-68.5; P < 0.001). The ECG risk score increased the C-statistic from 0.625 to 0.753 (P < 0.001), with net reclassification improvement of 0.319 (P < 0.001). In the ARIC cohort validation, risk of SCD associated with ≥4 ECG abnormalities remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 4.84; 95% CI 2.34-9.99; P < 0.001; C-statistic improvement 0.759-0.774; P = 0.019). Conclusion This novel cumulative ECG risk score was independently associated with SCD and was particularly effective for LVEF >35% where risk stratification is currently unavailable. These findings warrant further evaluation in prospective clinical investigations.
AB - Aims There is an urgent need to extend sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification beyond the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We evaluated whether a cumulative electrocardiogram (ECG) risk score would improve identification of individuals at high risk of SCD. Methods and results In the community-based Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study (catchment population 1/41 million), 522 SCD cases with archived 12-lead ECG available (65.3 ± 14.5 years, 66% male) were compared with 736 geographical controls to assess the incremental value of multiple ECG parameters in SCD prediction. Heart rate, LV hypertrophy, QRS transition zone, QRS-T angle, QTc, and Tpeak-to-Tend interval remained significant in the final model, which was externally validated in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Sixteen percent of cases and 3% of controls had ≥4 abnormal ECG markers. After adjusting for clinical factors and LVEF, increasing ECG risk score was associated with progressively greater odds of SCD. Overall, subjects with ≥4 ECG abnormalities had an odds ratio (OR) of 21.2 for SCD [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.4-47.7; P < 0.001]. In the LVEF >35% subgroup, the OR was 26.1 (95% CI 9.9-68.5; P < 0.001). The ECG risk score increased the C-statistic from 0.625 to 0.753 (P < 0.001), with net reclassification improvement of 0.319 (P < 0.001). In the ARIC cohort validation, risk of SCD associated with ≥4 ECG abnormalities remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 4.84; 95% CI 2.34-9.99; P < 0.001; C-statistic improvement 0.759-0.774; P = 0.019). Conclusion This novel cumulative ECG risk score was independently associated with SCD and was particularly effective for LVEF >35% where risk stratification is currently unavailable. These findings warrant further evaluation in prospective clinical investigations.
KW - Death
KW - Electrocardiography
KW - Left ventricular ejection fraction
KW - Prevention
KW - Risk stratification
KW - Sudden cardiac
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032486891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032486891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx331
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx331
M3 - Article
C2 - 28662567
AN - SCOPUS:85032486891
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 38
SP - 3017
EP - 3025
JO - European heart journal
JF - European heart journal
IS - 40
ER -