Electronic medical records are not associated with improved documentation in community primary care practices

Karissa A. Hahn, Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland, Deborah J. Cohen, Alicja K. Piasecki, Jesse C. Crosson, Elizabeth C. Clark, Benjamin F. Crabtree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


The adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) in ambulatory settings has been widely recommended. It is hoped that EMRs will improve care; however, little is known about the effect of EMR use on care quality in this setting. This study compares EMR versus paper medical record documentation of basic health history and preventive service indicators in 47 community-based practices. Differences in practice-level documentation rates between practices that did and did not use an EMR were examined using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test and robust regression, adjusting for practice-level covariates. Frequency of documentation of health history and preventive service indicator items were similar in the 2 groups of practices. Although EMRs provide the capacity for more robust record keeping, the community-based practices here do not use EMRs to their full capacity. EMR usage does not guarantee more systematic record keeping and thus may not lead to improved quality in the community practice setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-277
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes


  • electronic medical records
  • medical record review
  • primary care
  • quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Electronic medical records are not associated with improved documentation in community primary care practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this