TY - JOUR
T1 - Emerging role of powered instrumentation in airway surgery
AU - Reed, Andre L.
AU - Flint, Paul
PY - 2001/12/31
Y1 - 2001/12/31
N2 - Endoscopic removal of laryngeal and tracheal lesions generally is performed using laser technology or microlaryngeal instrumentation. A new development, the powered laryngeal shaver or microdebrider, has provided an alternative to conventional endoscopic surgery and laser resection of most airway lesions. Since its introduction to head and neck surgery in 1996, the laryngeal microdebrider has been used to resect endoscopically lesions ranging from laryngeal papillomas to obstructing endobronchial neoplasms. Advantages of the laryngeal microdebrider over conventional endoscopic laryngeal surgery include improved access to anterior commissure, subglottic, and tracheal lesions and reduced operative time. Relative to laser surgery, the laryngeal microdebrider is safer because it eliminates the risks of airway fire, thermal injury, and potentially infectious laser plume. This article reviews the development of the microdebrider, indications, surgical technique, and advantages and disadvantages relative to conventional microlaryngeal surgery.
AB - Endoscopic removal of laryngeal and tracheal lesions generally is performed using laser technology or microlaryngeal instrumentation. A new development, the powered laryngeal shaver or microdebrider, has provided an alternative to conventional endoscopic surgery and laser resection of most airway lesions. Since its introduction to head and neck surgery in 1996, the laryngeal microdebrider has been used to resect endoscopically lesions ranging from laryngeal papillomas to obstructing endobronchial neoplasms. Advantages of the laryngeal microdebrider over conventional endoscopic laryngeal surgery include improved access to anterior commissure, subglottic, and tracheal lesions and reduced operative time. Relative to laser surgery, the laryngeal microdebrider is safer because it eliminates the risks of airway fire, thermal injury, and potentially infectious laser plume. This article reviews the development of the microdebrider, indications, surgical technique, and advantages and disadvantages relative to conventional microlaryngeal surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035216042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035216042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00020840-200112000-00010
DO - 10.1097/00020840-200112000-00010
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0035216042
SN - 1068-9508
VL - 9
SP - 387
EP - 392
JO - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 6
ER -