Erratum: Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium (American Journal of Human Genetics (2016) 98(6) (1067–1076) (S0002929716300593) (10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024))

Laura M. Amendola, Gail P. Jarvik, Michael C. Leo, Heather M. McLaughlin, Yassmine Akkari, Michelle D. Amaral, Jonathan S. Berg, Sawona Biswas, Kevin M. Bowling, Laura K. Conlin, Greg M. Cooper, Michael O. Dorschner, Matthew C. Dulik, Arezou A. Ghazani, Rajarshi Ghosh, Robert C. Green, Ragan Hart, Carrie Horton, Jennifer J. Johnston, Matthew S. LeboAleksandar Milosavljevic, Jeffrey Ou, Christine M. Pak, Ronak Y. Patel, Sumit Punj, Carolyn Sue Richards, Joseph Salama, Natasha T. Strande, Yaping Yang, Sharon E. Plon, Leslie G. Biesecker, Heidi L. Rehm

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

102 Scopus citations

Abstract

(The American Journal of Human Genetics 98, 1067–1076; June 2, 2016) On page 1072 in the originally published version of this article, PS2 was a typo and should have read PS3 in the following sentence: “The other most common examples of modified strength included the following: PVS1 (a predicted null variant in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease) was downgraded from very strong four times, PS2 (well-established functional studies show a deleterious effect) was downgraded three times, and BS1 (MAF is too high for the disorder) was downgraded three times.” The error has been corrected online, and the authors apologize for the oversight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247
Number of pages1
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume99
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 7 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium (American Journal of Human Genetics (2016) 98(6) (1067–1076) (S0002929716300593) (10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this