Estimation of time cost of anti-cancer drugs approved based on comparisons to best supportive care: A cross sectional analysis

Vinay Prasad, Timothée Olivier, Emerson Y. Chen, Alyson Haslam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Financial costs from cancer treatment are increasingly recognized, but what has historically been underrecognized is the time cost of therapy. We sought to estimate the time burden of anti-cancer drugs approved based on comparisons to best supportive care (BSC), with the assumption that without this drug, a patient could have been treated with observation, home palliative care or hospice services, with minimal time seeking medical care. Methods: We searched all FDA approvals (2009 - March 2022) for randomized trials that used BSC as a treatment option for an anti-tumor drug in the metastatic setting and abstracted data on treatment related activities. We then estimated time spent on these activities using previously calculated times. Results: Of the 13 drugs tested against BSC, nine studies demonstrated an improvement in median OS (median 2.1 months). The median monthly time spent for patients in the intervention arm of BSC trials was 15.8 h. Conclusion: Time is a valuable resource for people who have cancer, but especially for patients who may have few to no remaining treatment options, and yet, we found that patients can spend up to 16 h in anti-cancer drug related activities per month. Policy summary: Because survival outcomes are variable for patients being treated in later lines of therapy, time resources are a valuable consideration in the treatment plan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100363
JournalJournal of Cancer Policy
Volume34
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Best supportive care
  • Time costs
  • Treatment options

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of time cost of anti-cancer drugs approved based on comparisons to best supportive care: A cross sectional analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this