Ethical dilemmas with third party observers

Kevin Duff, Jerid M. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The practice of forensic neuropsychology can lead to many potential ethical dilemmas, including the request that a third party observer be present during an examination. Following a case example, we review relevant Ethical Standards from the recent revision of the American Psychological Association's Ethics Code (APA, 2002), as well as policy statements by the National Academy of Neuropsychology (NAN, 2000) and the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN, 2001) that should be considered when confronted with the request for observation by a third party. As many ethical dilemmas are rarely clear-cut, their answers will likely generate additional questions for the individual practitioner and the profession. Finally, we provide some suggested courses of action when presented with similar requests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-82
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Forensic Neuropsychology
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ethical standards
  • Forensic
  • Neuropsychological evaluation
  • Third party observer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical dilemmas with third party observers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this