Evaluating on-board kVCT- and MVCT-based dose calculation accuracy using a thorax phantom for helical tomotherapy treatments

Purpose. To evaluate the impact of CT number calibration and imaging parameter selection on dose calculation accuracy relative to the CT planning process in thoracic treatments for on-board helical CT imaging systems used in helical tomotherapy. Methods and Materials. Direct CT number calibrations were performed with appropriate protocols for each imaging system using an electron density phantom. Large volume and SBRT treatment plans were simulated and optimized for planning CT scans of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom and transferred to registered kVCT and MVCT scans of the phantom as appropriate. Relevant DVH metrics and dose-difference maps were used to evaluate and compare dose calculation accuracy relative to the planning CT based on a variation in imaging parameters applied for the on-board systems. Results. For helical kVCT scans of the thorax phantom, median differences in DVH parameters for the large volume treatment plan were less than ±1% with dose to the target volume either over- or underestimated depending on the imaging parameters utilized for CT number calibration and thorax phantom acquisition. For the lung SBRT plan calculated on helical kVCT scans, median dose differences were up to -2.7% with a more noticeable dependence on parameter selection. For MVCT scans, median dose differences for the large volume plan were within +2% with dose to the target overestimated regardless of the imaging protocol. Conclusion. Accurate dose calculations (median errors of <±1%) using a thorax phantom simulating realistic patient geometry and scatter conditions can be achieved with images acquired with a helical kVCT system on a helical tomotherapy unit. This accuracy is considerably improved relative to that achieved with the MV-based approach. In a clinical setting, careful consideration should be made when selecting appropriate kVCT imaging parameters for this process as dose calculation accuracy was observed to vary with both parameter selection and treatment type.