Evaluation of a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Resident Non-surgical Cosmetic Clinic Experience

Alexis K. Bagwell, Nicole Santucci, Jourdan Carboy, Alicia Johnson, Allison C. Nauta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: An important component of plastic surgery residency training is independent cosmetic patient management. A resident cosmetic clinic was created at Oregon Health & Science University in 2007 to expand this experience. The cosmetic clinic has traditionally been most successful in offering nonsurgical facial rejuvenation with neuromodulators and soft tissue fillers. This study focuses on the demographics of the patient population and the treatments provided over a 5-year period and compares this experience to those of the same program's attending cosmetic clinics. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients seen at Oregon Health & Science University's Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Resident Cosmetic Clinic between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021 was performed. Patient demographics, type of injectable received (neuromodulator versus soft tissue filler), location of injection, and additional cosmetic procedures were evaluated. Results: Two hundred patients met the study criteria, which included 114 seen in the resident clinic (RC), 31 seen in attending clinic (AC), and 55 patients seen in both. A primary analysis compared the two groups seen in the resident and attending only clinics. The average age of patients seen in the RC was younger, 45 versus 51.5 (P ≤ 0.05). There was a trend toward more patients in the RC being involved in healthcare as compared to those patients seen in the AC, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant. The median number of neuromodulator visits in the RC was 2 (1, 4) versus 1 (1, 2) in the AC (P ≤ 0.05) The most common location for neuromodulator injections in both clinics was the corrugators. Conclusions: Patients in the resident cosmetic clinic were younger females, most receiving neuromodulator injections. No statistically significant differences were identified in patient population, injections received, and location of injections between the two clinics, indicating a similar trainee skill set and patient care plan between the two clinics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-39
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume287
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cosmetic clinic
  • Neuromodulator
  • Resident education
  • Soft tissue filler

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Resident Non-surgical Cosmetic Clinic Experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this