TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of multimedia medication reconciliation software
T2 - A randomized controlled, single-blind trial to measure diagnostic accuracy for discrepancy detection
AU - Lesselroth, Blake J.
AU - Adams, Kathleen
AU - Church, Victoria L.
AU - Tallett, Stephanie
AU - Russ, Yelizaveta
AU - Wiedrick, Jack
AU - Forsberg, Christopher
AU - Dorr, David A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Our local Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this study. All participants provided written consent. We registered with ClinicalTrials.Gov (Identifier: NCT02135731) prior to data analysis. This study was funded in part by the VA National Center for Patient Safety.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by VA National Center for Patient Safety.
Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the generous support from the VA Portland Healthcare System and the VA Chief Business Office. The authors also thank Richard Pham, PharmD, for assistance with the development and piloting our discrepancy classification instrument.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Schattauer.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Background The Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System developed a medication history collection software that displays prescription names and medication images. Objective This article measures the frequency of medication discrepancy reporting using the medication history collection software and compares with the frequency of reporting using a paper-based process. This article also determines the accuracy of each method by comparing both strategies to a best possible medication history. Study Design Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting Three community-based primary care clinics associated with the Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System: a 300-bed teaching facility and ambulatory care network serving Veteran soldiers in the Pacific Northwest United States. Participants Of 212 patients with primary care appointments, 209 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention Patients randomized to a software-directed medication history or a paper-based medication history. Randomization and allocation to treatment groups were performed using a computer-based random number generator. Assignments were placed in a sealed envelope and opened after participant consent. The research coordinator did not know or have access to the treatment assignment until the time of presentation. Main Outcome Measures The primary analysis compared the discrepancy detection rates between groups with respect to the health record and a best possible medication history.
AB - Background The Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System developed a medication history collection software that displays prescription names and medication images. Objective This article measures the frequency of medication discrepancy reporting using the medication history collection software and compares with the frequency of reporting using a paper-based process. This article also determines the accuracy of each method by comparing both strategies to a best possible medication history. Study Design Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting Three community-based primary care clinics associated with the Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System: a 300-bed teaching facility and ambulatory care network serving Veteran soldiers in the Pacific Northwest United States. Participants Of 212 patients with primary care appointments, 209 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention Patients randomized to a software-directed medication history or a paper-based medication history. Randomization and allocation to treatment groups were performed using a computer-based random number generator. Assignments were placed in a sealed envelope and opened after participant consent. The research coordinator did not know or have access to the treatment assignment until the time of presentation. Main Outcome Measures The primary analysis compared the discrepancy detection rates between groups with respect to the health record and a best possible medication history.
KW - Clinical informatics
KW - Clinical information systems
KW - Consumer health informatics
KW - Medication adherence
KW - Medication errors
KW - Medication reconciliation
KW - Medication review
KW - Quality improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060548505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060548505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1645889
DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1645889
M3 - Article
C2 - 29719884
AN - SCOPUS:85060548505
SN - 1869-0327
VL - 9
SP - 285
EP - 301
JO - Applied Clinical Informatics
JF - Applied Clinical Informatics
IS - 2
ER -