TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors affecting the implementation of evidence-based Progressive Tinnitus Management in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers
AU - Zaugg, Tara L.
AU - Thielman, Emily J.
AU - Carlson, Kathleen F.
AU - Tuepker, Anaïs
AU - Elnitsky, Christine
AU - Drummond, Karen L.
AU - Schmidt, Caroline J.
AU - Newell, Summer
AU - Kaelin, Christine
AU - Choma, Christie
AU - Henry, James A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) through a Rapid Response Project mechanism (RRP 13-440/IRB3295) (JAH). https://www.queri. research.va.gov The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Public Library of Science. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Purpose: Progressive Tinnitus Management (PTM) is an evidence-based interdisciplinary steppedcare approach to improving quality of life for patients with tinnitus. PTM was endorsed by Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Audiology leadership in 2009. Factors affecting implementation of PTM are unknown. We conducted a study to: 1) estimate levels of PTM program implementation in VA Audiology and Mental Health clinics across the country; and 2) identify barriers and facilitators to PTM implementation based on the experiences of VA audiologists and mental health providers. Method We conducted an anonymous, web-based survey targeting Audiology and Mental Health leaders at 144 major VA facilities. Quantitative analyses summarized respondents' facility characteristics and levels of program implementation (full PTM, partial PTM, or no PTM). Qualitative analyses identified themes in factors influencing the implementation of PTM across VA sites. Results: Surveys from 87 audiologists and 66 mental health clinicians revealed that few facilities offered full PTM; the majority offered partial or no PTM. Inductive analysis of the openended survey responses identified seven factors influencing implementation of PTM: 1) available resources, 2) service collaboration, 3) prioritization, 4) Veterans' preferences and needs, 5) clinician training, 6) awareness of (evidence-based) options, and 7) perceptions of scope of practice. Conclusion: Results suggest wide variation in services provided, a need for greater engagement of mental health providers in tinnitus care, and an interest among both audiologists and mental health providers in receiving tinnitus-related training. Future research should address barriers to PTM implementation, including methods to: 1) improve understanding among mental health providers of their potential role in tinnitus management; 2) enhance coordination of tinnitus-related care between health care disciplines; and 3) collect empirical data on Veterans' need for and interest in PTM, including delivery by telehealth modalities.
AB - Purpose: Progressive Tinnitus Management (PTM) is an evidence-based interdisciplinary steppedcare approach to improving quality of life for patients with tinnitus. PTM was endorsed by Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Audiology leadership in 2009. Factors affecting implementation of PTM are unknown. We conducted a study to: 1) estimate levels of PTM program implementation in VA Audiology and Mental Health clinics across the country; and 2) identify barriers and facilitators to PTM implementation based on the experiences of VA audiologists and mental health providers. Method We conducted an anonymous, web-based survey targeting Audiology and Mental Health leaders at 144 major VA facilities. Quantitative analyses summarized respondents' facility characteristics and levels of program implementation (full PTM, partial PTM, or no PTM). Qualitative analyses identified themes in factors influencing the implementation of PTM across VA sites. Results: Surveys from 87 audiologists and 66 mental health clinicians revealed that few facilities offered full PTM; the majority offered partial or no PTM. Inductive analysis of the openended survey responses identified seven factors influencing implementation of PTM: 1) available resources, 2) service collaboration, 3) prioritization, 4) Veterans' preferences and needs, 5) clinician training, 6) awareness of (evidence-based) options, and 7) perceptions of scope of practice. Conclusion: Results suggest wide variation in services provided, a need for greater engagement of mental health providers in tinnitus care, and an interest among both audiologists and mental health providers in receiving tinnitus-related training. Future research should address barriers to PTM implementation, including methods to: 1) improve understanding among mental health providers of their potential role in tinnitus management; 2) enhance coordination of tinnitus-related care between health care disciplines; and 3) collect empirical data on Veterans' need for and interest in PTM, including delivery by telehealth modalities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099116064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099116064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0242007
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0242007
M3 - Article
C2 - 33370307
AN - SCOPUS:85099116064
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 12 December
M1 - e0242007
ER -