Female Authorship in Preclinical Cardiovascular Research: Temporal Trends and Influence on Experimental Design

Alisha Labinaz, Jeffrey A. Marbach, Richard G. Jung, Robert Moreland, Pouya Motazedian, Pietro Di Santo, Aisling A. Clancy, Zachary MacDonald, Trevor Simard, Benjamin Hibbert, F. Daniel Ramirez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this analysis of 3,396 preclinical cardiovascular studies, women were first, senior, and both first and senior authors in 41.3%, 20.7%, and 11.0% of the studies, respectively. Female authorship increased over a 10-year period. However, the proportion of studies with first and senior authors of differing sex was low and stable, suggesting that segregation by sex in mentorship relationships exists and persists. Female authors were more likely to consider sex as a biological variable, but author sex was not associated with other measures of experimental rigor or research impact, indicating that women's underrepresentation was not due to differences in research capacity or impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-477
Number of pages7
JournalJACC: Basic to Translational Science
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cardiology
  • mentorship
  • translational research
  • women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Female Authorship in Preclinical Cardiovascular Research: Temporal Trends and Influence on Experimental Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this