TY - JOUR
T1 - From sharing voices to making decisions
T2 - The case for centring community ownership in evaluation of health programme planning and management
AU - Chi, Chunhuei
AU - Núñez, Alicia
AU - Tuepker, Anaïs
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Community participation in health programme planning has gained traction in public health in recent decades. When an idea enters the mainstream, it becomes vulnerable to overuse and dilution, and public health professionals claiming “community participation” may intentionally or unintentionally prevent more meaningful participatory action. The principle of community-centred planning is seldom integrated into programme evaluation. We have previously argued that, to prevent ambiguity and abuse, a stronger and more explicit idea of community ownership is useful. Un-like “participation”, “ownership” leaves little room for dilution. Method: This perspective piece explores a framework to support evaluating community ownership in planning, by emphasising decision-making power in health planning and management as a necessary element for evaluation alongside other outcomes. After defining the concept of community ownership, we identify and discuss challenges and research gaps related to implementing community ownership in health programme planning, management, and evaluation. Such issues include considering which communities have claims to programme ownership, alternative approaches to representation and participation that support ownership, gathering community values and preferences, and incorporating them into ongoing programme planning, management and evaluation. We consider methodological issues likely to arise when transitioning from gathering community voices - which is valuable but incomplete work - towards community decision making power in planning and evaluation. Results: We use cases from recent policy and research in Chile as examples to consider through the lens of this framework. Finally, we discuss some current constraints in implementing community ownership in healthcare planning and evaluation. Conclusion: We encourage exploring how to practice evaluation in ways that will further our ability to be helpful professional supporters of community self-determination in finding their paths to health.
AB - Background: Community participation in health programme planning has gained traction in public health in recent decades. When an idea enters the mainstream, it becomes vulnerable to overuse and dilution, and public health professionals claiming “community participation” may intentionally or unintentionally prevent more meaningful participatory action. The principle of community-centred planning is seldom integrated into programme evaluation. We have previously argued that, to prevent ambiguity and abuse, a stronger and more explicit idea of community ownership is useful. Un-like “participation”, “ownership” leaves little room for dilution. Method: This perspective piece explores a framework to support evaluating community ownership in planning, by emphasising decision-making power in health planning and management as a necessary element for evaluation alongside other outcomes. After defining the concept of community ownership, we identify and discuss challenges and research gaps related to implementing community ownership in health programme planning, management, and evaluation. Such issues include considering which communities have claims to programme ownership, alternative approaches to representation and participation that support ownership, gathering community values and preferences, and incorporating them into ongoing programme planning, management and evaluation. We consider methodological issues likely to arise when transitioning from gathering community voices - which is valuable but incomplete work - towards community decision making power in planning and evaluation. Results: We use cases from recent policy and research in Chile as examples to consider through the lens of this framework. Finally, we discuss some current constraints in implementing community ownership in healthcare planning and evaluation. Conclusion: We encourage exploring how to practice evaluation in ways that will further our ability to be helpful professional supporters of community self-determination in finding their paths to health.
KW - community decision making
KW - community ownership
KW - community participation
KW - governance
KW - international health
KW - programme planning and evaluation
KW - upstream evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137913351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137913351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hpm.3571
DO - 10.1002/hpm.3571
M3 - Article
C2 - 36100969
AN - SCOPUS:85137913351
SN - 0749-6753
VL - 37
SP - 8
EP - 19
JO - International Journal of Health Planning and Management
JF - International Journal of Health Planning and Management
IS - S1
ER -