TY - JOUR
T1 - From the psychosis prodrome to the first-episode of psychosis
T2 - No evidence of a cognitive decline
AU - Carrión, Ricardo E.
AU - Walder, Deborah J.
AU - Auther, Andrea M.
AU - McLaughlin, Danielle
AU - Zyla, Heather O.
AU - Adelsheim, Steven
AU - Calkins, Roderick
AU - Carter, Cameron S.
AU - McFarland, Bentson
AU - Melton, Ryan
AU - Niendam, Tara
AU - Ragland, J. Daniel
AU - Sale, Tamara G.
AU - Taylor, Stephan F.
AU - McFarlane, William R.
AU - Cornblatt, Barbara A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grants MH61523 and MH081857 from the National Institute of Mental Health (Cornblatt), 5R01MH059883-11 (Carter), R21MH101676 (Taylor), K23MH087708 (Niendam), R01MH105411 (Ragland), and the Zucker Hillside Hospital NIMH Advanced Center for Intervention and Services Research for the Study of Schizophrenia MH074543 (John M Kane, M.D.). Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (# 67525 ) with additional institutional support from the Maine Medical Center Research Institute and the State of Maine.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Cognitive deficits have an important role in the neurodevelopment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. However, there is a continuing debate as to whether cognitive impairments in the psychosis prodrome are stable predictors of eventual psychosis or undergo a decline due to the onset of psychosis. In the present study, to determine how cognition changes as illness emerges, we examined baseline neurocognitive performance in a large sample of helping-seeking youth ranging in clinical state from low-risk for psychosis through individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for illness to early first-episode patients (EFEP). At baseline, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus battery was administered to 322 individuals (205 CHRs, 28 EFEPs, and 89 help-seeking controls, HSC) that were part of the larger Early Detection, Intervention and Prevention of Psychosis Program study. CHR individuals were further divided into those who did (CHR-T; n = 12, 6.8%) and did not (CHR-NT, n = 163) convert to psychosis over follow-up (Mean = 99.20 weeks, SD = 21.54). ANCOVAs revealed that there were significant overall group differences (CHR, EFEP, HSC) in processing speed, verbal learning, and overall neurocognition, relative to healthy controls (CNTL). In addition, the CHR-NTs performed similarly to the HSC group, with mild to moderate cognitive deficits relative to the CTRL group. The CHR-Ts mirrored the EFEP group, with large deficits in processing speed, working memory, attention/vigilance, and verbal learning (>1 SD below CNTLs). Interestingly, only verbal learning impairments predicted transition to psychosis, when adjusting for age, education, symptoms, antipsychotic medication, and neurocognitive performance in the other domains. Our findings suggest that large neurocognitive deficits are present prior to illness onset and represent vulnerability markers for psychosis. The results of this study further reinforce that verbal learning should be specifically targeted for preventive intervention for psychosis.
AB - Cognitive deficits have an important role in the neurodevelopment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. However, there is a continuing debate as to whether cognitive impairments in the psychosis prodrome are stable predictors of eventual psychosis or undergo a decline due to the onset of psychosis. In the present study, to determine how cognition changes as illness emerges, we examined baseline neurocognitive performance in a large sample of helping-seeking youth ranging in clinical state from low-risk for psychosis through individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for illness to early first-episode patients (EFEP). At baseline, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus battery was administered to 322 individuals (205 CHRs, 28 EFEPs, and 89 help-seeking controls, HSC) that were part of the larger Early Detection, Intervention and Prevention of Psychosis Program study. CHR individuals were further divided into those who did (CHR-T; n = 12, 6.8%) and did not (CHR-NT, n = 163) convert to psychosis over follow-up (Mean = 99.20 weeks, SD = 21.54). ANCOVAs revealed that there were significant overall group differences (CHR, EFEP, HSC) in processing speed, verbal learning, and overall neurocognition, relative to healthy controls (CNTL). In addition, the CHR-NTs performed similarly to the HSC group, with mild to moderate cognitive deficits relative to the CTRL group. The CHR-Ts mirrored the EFEP group, with large deficits in processing speed, working memory, attention/vigilance, and verbal learning (>1 SD below CNTLs). Interestingly, only verbal learning impairments predicted transition to psychosis, when adjusting for age, education, symptoms, antipsychotic medication, and neurocognitive performance in the other domains. Our findings suggest that large neurocognitive deficits are present prior to illness onset and represent vulnerability markers for psychosis. The results of this study further reinforce that verbal learning should be specifically targeted for preventive intervention for psychosis.
KW - Clinical high risk
KW - Early Intervention
KW - Early Psychosis
KW - Neurocognition
KW - Neuropsychology
KW - Prodrome
KW - Schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032786379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032786379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 29121595
AN - SCOPUS:85032786379
SN - 0022-3956
VL - 96
SP - 231
EP - 238
JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research
JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research
ER -