TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher Quality, Lower Cost with an Innovative Geriatrics Consultation Service
AU - Bernstein, Juliana M.
AU - Graven, Peter
AU - Drago, Kathleen
AU - Dobbertin, Konrad
AU - Eckstrom, Elizabeth
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial Disclosure: Ms. Bernstein and Dr. Drago received funding support through a clinical development grant from the OHSU Faculty Practice Plan. An early version of the abstract for this manuscript was presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Geriatrics Society, May 2017. Conflict of Interest: None.
Funding Information:
The authors thank Lindsay Stutheit and Brian Garrison for assistance with data acquisition. We thank Katherine Bensching and Clea Cadham of the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics for their support of the inpatient geriatrics consultation program. Thanks also are extended to the members of the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Department of Trauma Surgery and Division of Hospital Medicine for their ongoing efforts to improve the quality of care of older adults in the acute care setting. Financial Disclosure: Ms. Bernstein and Dr. Drago received funding support through a clinical development grant from the OHSU Faculty Practice Plan. An early version of the abstract for this manuscript was presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Geriatrics Society, May 2017. Conflict of Interest: None. Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Bernstein, Dobbertin, Drago, Graven, Eckstrom. Acquisition of data: Dobbertin, Graven. Analysis and interpretation of data: Bernstein, Dobbertin, Drago, Graven. Drafting of manuscript: Bernstein, Dobbertin, Drago, Graven, Eckstrom. Critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content: Bernstein, Eckstrom. Sponsor's Role: The authors are solely responsible for the content and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Objectives: To design a value-driven, interprofessional inpatient geriatric consultation program coordinated with systems-level changes and studied outcomes and costs. Design: Propensity-matched case–control study of older adults hospitalized at an academic medical center (AMC) who did or did not receive geriatric consultation. Setting: Single tertiary-care AMC in Portland, Oregon. Participants: Adults aged 70 and older who received an inpatient geriatric consultation (n=464) and propensity-matched controls admitted before development of the consultation program (n=2,381). Pre- and postintervention controls were also incorporated into cost difference-in-difference analyses. Measurements: Daily charges, total charges, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) days, Foley catheter days, total medication doses per day, high-risk medication doses per day, advance directive and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation, restraint orders, discharge to home, and mortality. Results: On average, individuals who received a geriatric consultation had $611 lower charges per day than those without a consultation (p=.02). They spent on average 0.36 fewer days in the ICU (p<.001). They were less likely to have restraint orders (20.0% vs 27.9%, p<0.001), more likely to have a POLST (58.2% vs 44.6%, p<.001), and more likely to be discharged to home (33.4% vs 28.2%, p=.03). They received fewer doses of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and antiemetics (10, 5, and 7 fewer doses per 100 patient-days, respectively) and had lower in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 4%, p=.01). There was no difference in hospital LOS or 30-day readmission. Conclusion: Our consultation program resulted in significant reductions in daily charges, ICU days, potentially inappropriate medication use, and use of physical restraints and increased end-of-life planning. This model has potential for dissemination to other institutions operating in resource-scarce, value-driven settings.
AB - Objectives: To design a value-driven, interprofessional inpatient geriatric consultation program coordinated with systems-level changes and studied outcomes and costs. Design: Propensity-matched case–control study of older adults hospitalized at an academic medical center (AMC) who did or did not receive geriatric consultation. Setting: Single tertiary-care AMC in Portland, Oregon. Participants: Adults aged 70 and older who received an inpatient geriatric consultation (n=464) and propensity-matched controls admitted before development of the consultation program (n=2,381). Pre- and postintervention controls were also incorporated into cost difference-in-difference analyses. Measurements: Daily charges, total charges, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) days, Foley catheter days, total medication doses per day, high-risk medication doses per day, advance directive and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation, restraint orders, discharge to home, and mortality. Results: On average, individuals who received a geriatric consultation had $611 lower charges per day than those without a consultation (p=.02). They spent on average 0.36 fewer days in the ICU (p<.001). They were less likely to have restraint orders (20.0% vs 27.9%, p<0.001), more likely to have a POLST (58.2% vs 44.6%, p<.001), and more likely to be discharged to home (33.4% vs 28.2%, p=.03). They received fewer doses of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and antiemetics (10, 5, and 7 fewer doses per 100 patient-days, respectively) and had lower in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 4%, p=.01). There was no difference in hospital LOS or 30-day readmission. Conclusion: Our consultation program resulted in significant reductions in daily charges, ICU days, potentially inappropriate medication use, and use of physical restraints and increased end-of-life planning. This model has potential for dissemination to other institutions operating in resource-scarce, value-driven settings.
KW - academic medical center
KW - economics, hospital
KW - geriatric consultation
KW - geriatrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053038322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053038322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.15473
DO - 10.1111/jgs.15473
M3 - Article
C2 - 30094830
AN - SCOPUS:85053038322
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 66
SP - 1790
EP - 1795
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 9
ER -