TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying mechanisms of stance control
T2 - A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach
AU - Goodworth, Adam D.
AU - Peterka, Robert J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/2/15
Y1 - 2018/2/15
N2 - Background Posture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus. New method The current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures. Results We found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4% and 7.6% for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms. Comparison with existing method The single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative. Conclusions This study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.
AB - Background Posture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus. New method The current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures. Results We found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4% and 7.6% for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms. Comparison with existing method The single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative. Conclusions This study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.
KW - Balance
KW - Fitting
KW - Modeling
KW - Neural control
KW - System identification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039867583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039867583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 29277721
AN - SCOPUS:85039867583
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 296
SP - 44
EP - 56
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
ER -