Impact of cleft width in clefts of secondary palate on the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency

Derek J. Lam, Lynn L. Chiu, Kathleen C.Y. Sie, Jonathan A. Perkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), a common finding after cleft palate repair, and various risk factors, including cleft width. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with isolated cleft palates repaired from 2003 to 2008 at a tertiary children's hospital. Patients were observed postoperatively for development of VPI and palatal fistula. The primary risk factor was cleft width. Covariates included cleft length, age at surgery, and presence of associated syndrome. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs). Results: The cohort comprised 61 patients. Mean (SD) patient age at the time of cleft repair was 13 (3) months. Fistula rate was 3%. Overall rate of postoperative VPI was 32%. We found significant associations between VPI diagnosis and increasing age in months at the time of palate repair (OR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.2-1.7]) and between VPI and cleft width greater than 10 mm (OR, 5.3 [95% CI, 1.8-15.6]). The association between VPI and cleft width was similar after adjustment for cleft length, patient age, and syndrome presence (OR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.1-18.7]). Conclusions: Our results suggest that increased palatal cleft width is associated with a greater risk of postoperative VPI. Clinicians should consider this when counseling patient families for cleft palate repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-364
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of cleft width in clefts of secondary palate on the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this