TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Local Infiltration Analgesia on the Quality of Recovery After Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
T2 - A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
AU - Tan, Nicole L.
AU - Gotmaker, Robert
AU - Barrington, Michael J.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; †Department of Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia; ‡Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; and §Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia. Accepted for publication April 24, 2019. Funding: This trial was funded by grants from the Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Foundation, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and the Epworth Research Institute. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000844549. URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx ?searchTxt=12615000844549&isBasic=True. Reprints will not be available from the authors. Address correspondence to Nicole L. Tan, MBBS, FANZCA, MClinRes, Anaesthetic Services, Suite 5.8, The Epworth Centre, 32 Erin St, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia. Address e-mail to niki.tan@epworth.org.au. Copyright © 2019 International Anesthesia Research Society
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Anesthesia Research Society.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used in anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery; however, evidence for its efficacy is lacking. We hypothesized that LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with injection of placebo (0.9% saline) would improve patient quality of recovery on postoperative day (POD) 1, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. METHODS: Patients scheduled to have a primary unilateral anterior THA with a single surgeon in a tertiary level metropolitan hospital were randomized to receive LIA with either 2.5 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline as placebo. Patients and clinical and study personnel were blinded to group allocation. Perioperative care was standardized and this included spinal anesthesia and oral multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was a multidimensional (pain, physical comfort, physical independence, emotions, and psychological support) patient-reported quality of recovery scale, QoR-15, measured on POD 1. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were randomized; 6 patients were withdrawn after randomization and 2 patients had incomplete outcome data. The intention-To-Treat analysis included 152 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) QoR-15 score on POD 1 of the ropivacaine group was 119.5 (102-124), compared with the placebo group which had a median (IQR) of 115 (98-126). The median difference of 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -4 to 7; P =.56) was not statistically or clinically significant. An as-per-protocol sensitivity analysis of 146 patients who received spinal anesthesia without general anesthesia, and the allocated intervention, also showed no evidence of a significant difference between groups. Secondary outcomes (worst pain numerical rating scale at rest and with movement on POD 1, opioid consumption on PODs 1 and 2, mobilization on POD 1, Brief Pain Inventory severity and interference on POD 90, and length of stay) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with 0.9% saline as placebo did not improve quality of recovery 1 day after anterior THA.
AB - BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used in anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery; however, evidence for its efficacy is lacking. We hypothesized that LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with injection of placebo (0.9% saline) would improve patient quality of recovery on postoperative day (POD) 1, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. METHODS: Patients scheduled to have a primary unilateral anterior THA with a single surgeon in a tertiary level metropolitan hospital were randomized to receive LIA with either 2.5 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline as placebo. Patients and clinical and study personnel were blinded to group allocation. Perioperative care was standardized and this included spinal anesthesia and oral multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was a multidimensional (pain, physical comfort, physical independence, emotions, and psychological support) patient-reported quality of recovery scale, QoR-15, measured on POD 1. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were randomized; 6 patients were withdrawn after randomization and 2 patients had incomplete outcome data. The intention-To-Treat analysis included 152 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) QoR-15 score on POD 1 of the ropivacaine group was 119.5 (102-124), compared with the placebo group which had a median (IQR) of 115 (98-126). The median difference of 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -4 to 7; P =.56) was not statistically or clinically significant. An as-per-protocol sensitivity analysis of 146 patients who received spinal anesthesia without general anesthesia, and the allocated intervention, also showed no evidence of a significant difference between groups. Secondary outcomes (worst pain numerical rating scale at rest and with movement on POD 1, opioid consumption on PODs 1 and 2, mobilization on POD 1, Brief Pain Inventory severity and interference on POD 90, and length of stay) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with 0.9% saline as placebo did not improve quality of recovery 1 day after anterior THA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075291216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075291216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004255
DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004255
M3 - Article
C2 - 31166232
AN - SCOPUS:85075291216
SN - 0003-2999
VL - 129
SP - 1715
EP - 1722
JO - Anesthesia and analgesia
JF - Anesthesia and analgesia
IS - 6
ER -