TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of State Laws on Dispensing Opioid Prescriptions Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures
T2 - A Retrospective Large National Database Study
AU - Godil, Jamila
AU - Rapp, Katrina
AU - Smith, Spencer
AU - Ryu, Won Hyung A.
AU - Yoo, Jung U.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of state legislation on prescribing behavior after a commonly performed spinal procedure, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Methods: Two cohorts of patients from the Pearl Diver Database were created based on patients who underwent PLIF surgery in 2014-15 and 2018-19. We compared opioid prescription rates and morphine-milli-equivalent (MME) between states with and without prescription legislation. Results: We analyzed 50 958 PLIF patients from 2014-15 and 46 751 patients from 2018-19. Among them, 38 states passed opioid prescription laws in 2016-2017, while 12 states did not. The percentage of patients receiving opioid prescriptions within 365 days post-surgery remained similar in both time periods (49% in 2014-15 and 48% in 2018-2019). This trend was consistent across states with and without prescription legislation (50% vs 48% in 2014-2015, and similar in 2018-19). Opioid prescription quantity significantly decreased in all states between 2014-15 and 2018-19. In states with legislation, average MME dropped from 9198 ± 21 002 to 4932 ± 13 213 (46.4% decrease), and in states without legislation, it decreased from 9175 ± 21 032 to 4994 ± 11 687 (45.6% decrease). However, these differences were not statistically significant (P =.7985). Conclusion: From 2014 to 2018, there was a significant decrease in the number of opioids prescribed after PLIF. However, this decrease occurred irrespective of state legislation on prescribing practices being passed. We believe the reduction in opioids prescribed was due to increased awareness surrounding the dangers of opioids among physicians.
AB - Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of state legislation on prescribing behavior after a commonly performed spinal procedure, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Methods: Two cohorts of patients from the Pearl Diver Database were created based on patients who underwent PLIF surgery in 2014-15 and 2018-19. We compared opioid prescription rates and morphine-milli-equivalent (MME) between states with and without prescription legislation. Results: We analyzed 50 958 PLIF patients from 2014-15 and 46 751 patients from 2018-19. Among them, 38 states passed opioid prescription laws in 2016-2017, while 12 states did not. The percentage of patients receiving opioid prescriptions within 365 days post-surgery remained similar in both time periods (49% in 2014-15 and 48% in 2018-2019). This trend was consistent across states with and without prescription legislation (50% vs 48% in 2014-2015, and similar in 2018-19). Opioid prescription quantity significantly decreased in all states between 2014-15 and 2018-19. In states with legislation, average MME dropped from 9198 ± 21 002 to 4932 ± 13 213 (46.4% decrease), and in states without legislation, it decreased from 9175 ± 21 032 to 4994 ± 11 687 (45.6% decrease). However, these differences were not statistically significant (P =.7985). Conclusion: From 2014 to 2018, there was a significant decrease in the number of opioids prescribed after PLIF. However, this decrease occurred irrespective of state legislation on prescribing practices being passed. We believe the reduction in opioids prescribed was due to increased awareness surrounding the dangers of opioids among physicians.
KW - legislation
KW - lumbar fusion
KW - opioids
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176913822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85176913822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/21925682231215679
DO - 10.1177/21925682231215679
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85176913822
SN - 2192-5682
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
ER -