Improved method to stratify elderly patients with cancer at risk for competing events

Ruben Carmona, Kaveh Zakeri, Garrett Green, Lindsay Hwang, Sachin Gulaya, Beibei Xu, Rohan Verma, Casey W. Williamson, Daniel P. Triplett, Brent S. Rose, Hanjie Shen, Florin Vaida, James D. Murphy, Loren K. Mell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To compare a novel generalized competing event (GCE) model versus the standard Cox proportional hazards regression model for stratifying elderly patients with cancer who are at risk for competing events. Methods We identified 84,319 patients with nonmetastatic prostate, head and neck, and breast cancers from the SEER-Medicare database. Using demographic, tumor, and clinical characteristics, we trained risk scores on the basis of GCE versus Cox models for cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. In test sets, we examined the predictive ability of the risk scores on the different causes of death, including second cancer mortality, noncancer mortality, and cause-specific mortality, using Fine- Gray regression and area under the curve. We compared how well models stratified subpopulations according to the ratio of the cumulative cause-specific hazard for cancer mortality to the cumulative hazard for overall mortality (v) using the Akaike Information Criterion. Results In each sample, increasing GCE risk scores were associated with increased cancer-specific mortality and decreased competing mortality, whereas risk scores from Cox models were associated with both increased cancer-specific mortality and competing mortality. GCE models created greater separation in the area under the curve for cancer-specific mortality versus noncancer mortality (P , .001), indicating better discriminatory ability between these events. Comparing the GCE model to Cox models of cause-specific mortality or all-cause mortality, the respective Akaike Information Criterion scores were superior (lower) in each sample: prostate cancer, 28.6 versus 35.5 versus 39.4; head and neck cancer, 21.1 versus 29.4 versus 40.2; and breast cancer, 24.6 versus 32.3 versus 50.8. Conclusion Compared with standard modeling approaches, GCE models improve stratification of elderly patients with cancer according to their risk of dying from cancer relative to overall mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1270-1277
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume34
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 10 2016
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved method to stratify elderly patients with cancer at risk for competing events'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this