TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved prediction of fracture risk leveraging a genome-wide polygenic risk score
AU - Lu, Tianyuan
AU - Forgetta, Vincenzo
AU - Keller-Baruch, Julyan
AU - Nethander, Maria
AU - Bennett, Derrick
AU - Forest, Marie
AU - Bhatnagar, Sahir
AU - Walters, Robin G.
AU - Lin, Kuang
AU - Chen, Zhengming
AU - Li, Liming
AU - Karlsson, Magnus
AU - Mellström, Dan
AU - Orwoll, Eric
AU - McCloskey, Eugene V.
AU - Kanis, John A.
AU - Leslie, William D.
AU - Clarke, Robert J.
AU - Ohlsson, Claes
AU - Greenwood, Celia M.T.
AU - Richards, J. Brent
N1 - Funding Information:
The Richards Research Group is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR: 365825; 409511), the Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, the NIH Foundation, the Cancer Research UK, and the Fonds de Recherche Québec Santé (FRQS). TL is supported by an FRQS Doctoral Training Fellowship and a McGill University Faculty of Medicine Scholarship. DB is supported by the UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. JBR is supported by an FRQS Clinical Research Scholarship. These funding agencies had no role in the design, implementation, or interpretation of this study. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
Funding Information:
This study was enabled in part by support provided by Calcul Québec ( https://www.calculquebec.ca/ ) and Compute Canada ( https://www.computecanada.ca ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Accurately quantifying the risk of osteoporotic fracture is important for directing appropriate clinical interventions. While skeletal measures such as heel quantitative speed of sound (SOS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density are able to predict the risk of osteoporotic fracture, the utility of such measurements is subject to the availability of equipment and human resources. Using data from 341,449 individuals of white British ancestry, we previously developed a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS), called gSOS, that captured 25.0% of the total variance in SOS. Here, we test whether gSOS can improve fracture risk prediction. Methods: We examined the predictive power of gSOS in five genome-wide genotyped cohorts, including 90,172 individuals of European ancestry and 25,034 individuals of Asian ancestry. We calculated gSOS for each individual and tested for the association between gSOS and incident major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. We tested whether adding gSOS to the risk prediction models had added value over models using other commonly used clinical risk factors. Results: A standard deviation decrease in gSOS was associated with an increased odds of incident major osteoporotic fracture in populations of European ancestry, with odds ratios ranging from 1.35 to 1.46 in four cohorts. It was also associated with a 1.26-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.41) increased odds of incident major osteoporotic fracture in the Asian population. We demonstrated that gSOS was more predictive of incident major osteoporotic fracture (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.734; 95% CI 0.727–0.740) and incident hip fracture (AUROC = 0.798; 95% CI 0.791–0.805) than most traditional clinical risk factors, including prior fracture, use of corticosteroids, rheumatoid arthritis, and smoking. We also showed that adding gSOS to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) could refine the risk prediction with a positive net reclassification index ranging from 0.024 to 0.072. Conclusions: We generated and validated a PRS for SOS which was associated with the risk of fracture. This score was more strongly associated with the risk of fracture than many clinical risk factors and provided an improvement in risk prediction. gSOS should be explored as a tool to improve risk stratification to identify individuals at high risk of fracture.
AB - Background: Accurately quantifying the risk of osteoporotic fracture is important for directing appropriate clinical interventions. While skeletal measures such as heel quantitative speed of sound (SOS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density are able to predict the risk of osteoporotic fracture, the utility of such measurements is subject to the availability of equipment and human resources. Using data from 341,449 individuals of white British ancestry, we previously developed a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS), called gSOS, that captured 25.0% of the total variance in SOS. Here, we test whether gSOS can improve fracture risk prediction. Methods: We examined the predictive power of gSOS in five genome-wide genotyped cohorts, including 90,172 individuals of European ancestry and 25,034 individuals of Asian ancestry. We calculated gSOS for each individual and tested for the association between gSOS and incident major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. We tested whether adding gSOS to the risk prediction models had added value over models using other commonly used clinical risk factors. Results: A standard deviation decrease in gSOS was associated with an increased odds of incident major osteoporotic fracture in populations of European ancestry, with odds ratios ranging from 1.35 to 1.46 in four cohorts. It was also associated with a 1.26-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.41) increased odds of incident major osteoporotic fracture in the Asian population. We demonstrated that gSOS was more predictive of incident major osteoporotic fracture (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.734; 95% CI 0.727–0.740) and incident hip fracture (AUROC = 0.798; 95% CI 0.791–0.805) than most traditional clinical risk factors, including prior fracture, use of corticosteroids, rheumatoid arthritis, and smoking. We also showed that adding gSOS to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) could refine the risk prediction with a positive net reclassification index ranging from 0.024 to 0.072. Conclusions: We generated and validated a PRS for SOS which was associated with the risk of fracture. This score was more strongly associated with the risk of fracture than many clinical risk factors and provided an improvement in risk prediction. gSOS should be explored as a tool to improve risk stratification to identify individuals at high risk of fracture.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100345855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100345855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13073-021-00838-6
DO - 10.1186/s13073-021-00838-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33536041
AN - SCOPUS:85100345855
SN - 1756-994X
VL - 13
JO - Genome Medicine
JF - Genome Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 16
ER -