Improving the quality of processing gastric cancer specimens: The pathologist's perspective

Alyson L. Mahar, Alia P. Qureshi, C. Andrea Ottensmeyer, Runjan Chetty, Aaron Pollett, Natalie G. Coburn, Frances C. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Research into surgeon and pathologist knowledge of guidelines for lymph node (LN) assessment in gastric cancer demonstrated a knowledge deficit. To understand factors affecting optimal assessment we surveyed pathologists to identify external barriers. Methods: Pathologists were identified using two Ontario physician databases and surveyed online or by mail, with a 40% response rate. Results: The majority (56%) of pathologists stated assessing an additional five LNs would not be a burden. Most (80%) pathologists disagreed with pay for performance for achieving quality standards. Qualitative analysis determined the majority of pathologists believed achieving quality standards was inherent to their profession and should not require incentives. Poor surgical specimen was identified as a barrier and underscores the importance of aiming quality improvement initiatives at the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion: In addition to education, tailoring an intervention to address all barriers, including laboratory constraints may be an effective means of improving gastric cancer care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-199
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of surgical oncology
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Pathology
  • Quality
  • Specimen processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the quality of processing gastric cancer specimens: The pathologist's perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this