TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidental abdominopelvic findings on expanded field-of-view lumbar spinal MRI
T2 - Frequency, clinical importance, and concordance in interpretation by neuroimaging and body imaging radiologists
AU - Maxwell, A. W.P.
AU - Keating, D. P.
AU - Nickerson, J. P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - AIM: To characterize the frequency of identification, clinical importance, and concordance in interpretation of incidental abdominopelvic findings identified on routine lumbar spinal MRI using supplemental expanded field-of-view (FOV) coronal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All lumbar spinal MRI reports over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of incidental abdominopelvic findings identified using expanded FOV coronal imaging. Medical records were used to identify those findings that received follow-up, which were then categorized according to final diagnosis and classified as "indeterminate," "likely clinically unimportant," and "likely clinically important". All cases that received follow-up were blindly and independently re-reviewed by a neuroimaging radiologist and body-imaging radiologist, and reviewer performances were compared to assess for agreement with regard to lesion significance, need for follow-up, and other parameters. RESULTS: In total, 2067 reports were reviewed: 687 (33.2%) featured one or more incidental abdominopelvic findings, and 102 (4.9%) findings received further evaluation. Of these, 11 (10.9%) were classified as "indeterminate," 50 (49%) as "likely clinically unimportant," and 41 (40.1%) were classified as "likely clinically important." Excellent agreement was observed between the reviewing radiologists for all evaluated parameters. CONCLUSION: The addition of an expanded FOV coronal sequence to the standard lumbar spinal MRI protocol was associated with the identification of a large number of incidental abdominopelvic findings, the minority of which represent likely clinically important findings. Most incidental findings were confidently dismissed by a neuroimaging radiologist as likely clinically unimportant without utilization of additional clinical or radiographic resources.
AB - AIM: To characterize the frequency of identification, clinical importance, and concordance in interpretation of incidental abdominopelvic findings identified on routine lumbar spinal MRI using supplemental expanded field-of-view (FOV) coronal imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All lumbar spinal MRI reports over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of incidental abdominopelvic findings identified using expanded FOV coronal imaging. Medical records were used to identify those findings that received follow-up, which were then categorized according to final diagnosis and classified as "indeterminate," "likely clinically unimportant," and "likely clinically important". All cases that received follow-up were blindly and independently re-reviewed by a neuroimaging radiologist and body-imaging radiologist, and reviewer performances were compared to assess for agreement with regard to lesion significance, need for follow-up, and other parameters. RESULTS: In total, 2067 reports were reviewed: 687 (33.2%) featured one or more incidental abdominopelvic findings, and 102 (4.9%) findings received further evaluation. Of these, 11 (10.9%) were classified as "indeterminate," 50 (49%) as "likely clinically unimportant," and 41 (40.1%) were classified as "likely clinically important." Excellent agreement was observed between the reviewing radiologists for all evaluated parameters. CONCLUSION: The addition of an expanded FOV coronal sequence to the standard lumbar spinal MRI protocol was associated with the identification of a large number of incidental abdominopelvic findings, the minority of which represent likely clinically important findings. Most incidental findings were confidently dismissed by a neuroimaging radiologist as likely clinically unimportant without utilization of additional clinical or radiographic resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925231420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925231420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2014.10.016
DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2014.10.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 25439794
AN - SCOPUS:84925231420
SN - 0009-9260
VL - 70
SP - 161
EP - 167
JO - Clinical Radiology
JF - Clinical Radiology
IS - 2
ER -