TY - JOUR
T1 - Let’s Talk About Firearms
T2 - Perspectives of Older Veterans and VA Clinicians on Universal and Dementia-Specific Firearm Safety Discussions
AU - Lafferty, Megan
AU - O’Neill, Anna Marie
AU - Cerra, Nicole
AU - Maxim, Lauren
AU - Mulcahy, Abigail
AU - Wyse, Jessica J.
AU - Carlson, Kathleen F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objectives: Veterans experience high rates of fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries. This risk may be compounded among Veterans who are rural-residing, aging, and/or experiencing cognitive decline or dementia. Firearm safety discussions are not broadly implemented across Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare settings due, in part, to concerns of causing Veterans to disengage from care. This study examines perceptions about firearm safety discussions to inform healthcare-based harm-reduction efforts. Methods: We conducted interviews with 34 Veterans (median age 70) and 22 clinicians from four VA facilities that treat high rates of rural patients with firearm-related injuries. Results: Most Veterans accepted the idea of universal firearm safety discussions at the VA. Some reported they might not be forthright in such discussions, but raising the topic would not stop them from engaging with VA care. Veterans and clinicians unanimously endorsed firearm safety discussions for older patients experiencing cognitive decline or dementia. Conclusions: VA patients and clinicians are amenable to firearm safety discussions during healthcare visits and especially endorse the need for such discussions among high-risk populations. Clinical Implications: Universal firearm safety discussions could be incorporated into standard VA practice, particularly for Veterans experiencing cognitive decline or dementia, without risking Veteran disengagement from care.
AB - Objectives: Veterans experience high rates of fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries. This risk may be compounded among Veterans who are rural-residing, aging, and/or experiencing cognitive decline or dementia. Firearm safety discussions are not broadly implemented across Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare settings due, in part, to concerns of causing Veterans to disengage from care. This study examines perceptions about firearm safety discussions to inform healthcare-based harm-reduction efforts. Methods: We conducted interviews with 34 Veterans (median age 70) and 22 clinicians from four VA facilities that treat high rates of rural patients with firearm-related injuries. Results: Most Veterans accepted the idea of universal firearm safety discussions at the VA. Some reported they might not be forthright in such discussions, but raising the topic would not stop them from engaging with VA care. Veterans and clinicians unanimously endorsed firearm safety discussions for older patients experiencing cognitive decline or dementia. Conclusions: VA patients and clinicians are amenable to firearm safety discussions during healthcare visits and especially endorse the need for such discussions among high-risk populations. Clinical Implications: Universal firearm safety discussions could be incorporated into standard VA practice, particularly for Veterans experiencing cognitive decline or dementia, without risking Veteran disengagement from care.
KW - Dementia
KW - firearms
KW - lethal means counseling
KW - older adults
KW - veterans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169836953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85169836953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07317115.2023.2254292
DO - 10.1080/07317115.2023.2254292
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169836953
SN - 0731-7115
JO - Clinical Gerontologist
JF - Clinical Gerontologist
ER -