Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: A comparison with other fixation techniques

Darin M. Friess, Albert Attia, Heather A. Vallier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Various traditional surgical treatment methods for displaced proximal humerus fractures were compared with locking plates. Ninety-eight patients were reviewed and functional outcomes were obtained. After a mean 45-month follow-up, trends were noted toward better fracture reduction with locking plates and greater range of motion (ROM) with percutaneous pinning. Complications occurred in 22 patients, unrelated to treatment type. Method of fixation did not correlate with outcome scores, but functional ROM was associated with better American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. Locking plates are comparable to traditional fixation methods. Functional ROM is associated with better outcome scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1183
Number of pages1
JournalOrthopedics
Volume31
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: A comparison with other fixation techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this