TY - JOUR
T1 - Long drives and red tape
T2 - mapping rural veteran access to primary care using causal-loop diagramming
AU - Kenzie, Erin S.
AU - Patzel, Mary
AU - Nelson, Erik
AU - Lovejoy, Travis
AU - Ono, Sarah
AU - Davis, Melinda M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the veterans, clinicians, staff, and veteran service officers who participated in this research. We are also grateful to the VA Office of Rural Health and the Veterans Rural Health Resource Center in Portland, OR, for funding and guiding this study and to Mellodie Seater for support in preparing this publication.
Funding Information:
Funding for this research was provided by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health (Grant Number 15529). The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Rural veterans experience more challenges than their urban peers in accessing primary care services, which can negatively impact their health and wellbeing. The factors driving this disparity are complex and involve patient, clinic, health system, community and policy influences. Federal policies over the last decade have relaxed requirements for some veterans to receive primary care services from community providers through their VA benefits, known as community care. Methods: We used a participatory systems mapping approach involving causal-loop diagramming to identify interrelationships between variables underlying challenges to veteran access to primary care and potential opportunities for change—known as leverage points in systems science. Our methods involved a secondary analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with rural veterans, VA staff, non-VA clinic staff and providers who serve rural veterans, and veteran service officers (VSOs) in the Northwest region of the US, followed by a two-part participatory modeling session with a study advisory board. We then applied Meadows’s leverage point framework to identify and categorize potential interventions to improve rural veteran access to primary care. Results: The final model illustrated challenges at the veteran, clinic, and system levels as experienced by stakeholders. Main components of the diagram pertained to the choice of VA or non-VA primary care, veteran satisfaction with the VA, enrollment in VA benefits and other insurance, community care authorization, reimbursement of non-VA care, referrals to specialty care, record sharing and communication between VA and non-VA providers, institutional stability of the VA, and staffing challenges. Fourteen interventions, including administrative and communications changes, were identified by analyzing the model using the leverage points framework. Conclusions: Our findings illustrate how challenges rural veterans face accessing health care are interconnected and persist despite recent changes to federal law pertaining to the VA health care system in recent years. Systems mapping and modeling approaches such as causal-loop diagramming have potential for engaging stakeholders and supporting intervention and implementation planning.
AB - Background: Rural veterans experience more challenges than their urban peers in accessing primary care services, which can negatively impact their health and wellbeing. The factors driving this disparity are complex and involve patient, clinic, health system, community and policy influences. Federal policies over the last decade have relaxed requirements for some veterans to receive primary care services from community providers through their VA benefits, known as community care. Methods: We used a participatory systems mapping approach involving causal-loop diagramming to identify interrelationships between variables underlying challenges to veteran access to primary care and potential opportunities for change—known as leverage points in systems science. Our methods involved a secondary analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with rural veterans, VA staff, non-VA clinic staff and providers who serve rural veterans, and veteran service officers (VSOs) in the Northwest region of the US, followed by a two-part participatory modeling session with a study advisory board. We then applied Meadows’s leverage point framework to identify and categorize potential interventions to improve rural veteran access to primary care. Results: The final model illustrated challenges at the veteran, clinic, and system levels as experienced by stakeholders. Main components of the diagram pertained to the choice of VA or non-VA primary care, veteran satisfaction with the VA, enrollment in VA benefits and other insurance, community care authorization, reimbursement of non-VA care, referrals to specialty care, record sharing and communication between VA and non-VA providers, institutional stability of the VA, and staffing challenges. Fourteen interventions, including administrative and communications changes, were identified by analyzing the model using the leverage points framework. Conclusions: Our findings illustrate how challenges rural veterans face accessing health care are interconnected and persist despite recent changes to federal law pertaining to the VA health care system in recent years. Systems mapping and modeling approaches such as causal-loop diagramming have potential for engaging stakeholders and supporting intervention and implementation planning.
KW - Causal-loop diagramming
KW - Health care access
KW - Primary care
KW - Rural
KW - Systems science
KW - Veteran
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136362058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136362058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-022-08318-2
DO - 10.1186/s12913-022-08318-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 35999540
AN - SCOPUS:85136362058
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 22
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 1075
ER -