TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa Receiving Intraocular Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Implants
AU - Birch, David G.
AU - Bennett, Lea D.
AU - Duncan, Jacque L.
AU - Weleber, Richard G.
AU - Pennesi, Mark E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: Supported by R01EY09076 (D.G.B.), the Foundation Fighting Blindness, Columbia, MD (D.G.B., J.L.D., M.E.P., R.G.W.), K08EY021186 (M.E.P.), Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY Career Development Award (M.E.P.), Nelson Trust Award for Retinitis Pigmentosa, New York, NY (J.L.D.), R01-FD004100 (J.L.D.), and unrestricted Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY grants to Casey Eye Institute and UCSF. Neurotech USA, Inc, Cumberland, Rhode Island supported the original CNTF4 trial. Financial disclosures-consulting: David G. Birch: Acucela, AGTC, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, QLT Phototherapeutics, Thrombogenics. Jacque L. Duncan: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Neurotech USA, Inc, Ocugen, Inc, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, QLT Phototherapeutics. Richard G. Weleber: AGTC, Sanofi-Fovea. Mark E. Pennesi: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Spark Therapeutics, AGTC, ProQR Therapeutics, Sanofi, CRF. The following author has no financial disclosures: Lea D. Bennett. The authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Purpose To evaluate the long-term efficacy of ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered via an intraocular encapsulated cell implant for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa. Design Long-term follow-up of a multicenter, sham-controlled study. Methods Thirty-six patients at 3 CNTF4 sites were randomly assigned to receive a high- or low-dose implant in 1 eye and sham surgery in the fellow eye. The primary endpoint (change in visual field sensitivity at 12 months) had been reported previously. Here we measure long-term visual acuity, visual field, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes in 24 patients either retaining or explanting the device at 24 months relative to sham-treated eyes. Results Eyes retaining the implant showed significantly greater visual field loss from baseline than either explanted eyes or sham eyes through 42 months. By 60 months and continuing through 96 months, visual field loss was comparable among sham-treated eyes, eyes retaining the implant, and explanted eyes, as was visual acuity and OCT macular volume. Conclusions Over the short term, ciliary neurotrophic factor released continuously from an intravitreal implant led to loss of total visual field sensitivity that was greater than the natural progression in the sham-treated eye. This additional loss of sensitivity related to the active implant was reversible when the implant was removed. Over the long term (60–96 months), there was no evidence of efficacy for visual acuity, visual field sensitivity, or OCT measures of retinal structure.
AB - Purpose To evaluate the long-term efficacy of ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered via an intraocular encapsulated cell implant for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa. Design Long-term follow-up of a multicenter, sham-controlled study. Methods Thirty-six patients at 3 CNTF4 sites were randomly assigned to receive a high- or low-dose implant in 1 eye and sham surgery in the fellow eye. The primary endpoint (change in visual field sensitivity at 12 months) had been reported previously. Here we measure long-term visual acuity, visual field, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes in 24 patients either retaining or explanting the device at 24 months relative to sham-treated eyes. Results Eyes retaining the implant showed significantly greater visual field loss from baseline than either explanted eyes or sham eyes through 42 months. By 60 months and continuing through 96 months, visual field loss was comparable among sham-treated eyes, eyes retaining the implant, and explanted eyes, as was visual acuity and OCT macular volume. Conclusions Over the short term, ciliary neurotrophic factor released continuously from an intravitreal implant led to loss of total visual field sensitivity that was greater than the natural progression in the sham-treated eye. This additional loss of sensitivity related to the active implant was reversible when the implant was removed. Over the long term (60–96 months), there was no evidence of efficacy for visual acuity, visual field sensitivity, or OCT measures of retinal structure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983517664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983517664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 27457255
AN - SCOPUS:84983517664
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 170
SP - 10
EP - 14
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
ER -