Online Diaries for Qualitative Evaluation: Gaining Real-Time Insights

Deborah J. Cohen, Laura C. Leviton, Nicole Isaacson, Alfred F. Tallia, Benjamin F. Crabtree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Interactive online diaries are a novel approach for evaluating project implementation and provide real-time communication between evaluation staff members and those implementing a program. Evaluation teams can guide the lines of inquiry and ensure that data are captured as implementation develops. When used together with conventional evaluation strategies, interactive online diaries allow for an in-depth understanding of project implementation, as well as the challenges program staff members confront and the solutions they develop. Interactive online diaries also can help evaluators address challenges such as self-reporting bias, documenting project evolution, and capturing implementers’ ongoing insights as they develop. These insights might otherwise be lost to the evaluation process. The authors describe the development and use of this online approach in the evaluation of a foundation-sponsored program to improve the provision of preventive care in physicians’ offices. The program included 17 practice-based research networks and their participating primary care practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-184
Number of pages22
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • diary method
  • health care quality improvement
  • online evaluation methods
  • process evaluation
  • qualitative evaluation method
  • real-time evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Online Diaries for Qualitative Evaluation: Gaining Real-Time Insights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this