Outcomes from a 3-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy regimen for patients with cervical cancer

Casey W. Williamson, Nikhil V. Kotha, Jingjing Zou, Derek Brown, Daniel Scanderbeg, Dominique Rash, John Einck, Catheryn Yashar, Loren K. Mell, Jyoti Mayadev

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: To estimate local control, survival, and toxicity associated with a 3-fraction (3F) image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) regimen compared to longer fraction (LF) for cervical cancer. METHODS: 150 patients treated between 2015-2020 with 3F (24Gy in 3 fractions) or LF (28…30 Gy in 4-5 fractions) were reviewed. The primary outcome was 2-year local failure. We compared overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), hospitalizations, and toxicity. RESULTS: There were 32 patients in the 3F group and 118 in the LF group, with a median follow up of 22 months. The 3F had worse performance status (p = 0.01) but otherwise similar characteristics. The 2-year local failure rate was 3.6% (95% CI 0%, 10.6%) for 3F, and 7.5% (95% CI 2.4%, 12.6%) for LF. The univariable hazard ratio (HR) for local failure for 3F was 0.43 (0.05, 3.43; p = 0.43). Moreover, 2 of 32 (6.3%) 3F patients experienced Grade …3 toxicity compared to 7 of 118 (5.9%) LF patients (p = 1.0), with no difference in hospitalization within 2 years (p = 0.66) and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Local control was excellent, with long term survival and toxicity similar between the groups. These findings support consideration of 3F.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)317-324
    Number of pages8
    JournalBrachytherapy
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2023

    Keywords

    • Cervical cancer
    • HDR brachytherapy
    • Hypofractionation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes from a 3-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy regimen for patients with cervical cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this