TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Implementation of ACE Screening in Pediatric Care Settings
T2 - A Qualitative Evaluation
AU - Estrada-Darley, Ingrid
AU - Chen, Peggy
AU - McBain, Ryan
AU - Alvarado, Gabriela
AU - Engel, Charles
AU - Malika, Nipher
AU - Kim, Deborah
AU - Machtinger, Edward
AU - McCaw, Brigid
AU - Thyne, Shannon
AU - Thompson, Nina
AU - Shekarchi, Amy
AU - Lightfoot, Marguerita
AU - Kuo, Anda
AU - Benedict, Darcy
AU - Gantz, Lisa
AU - Perry, Raymond
AU - Yap, Nancy
AU - Eberhart, Nicole
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Introduction: This qualitative research study explored the perspectives of adolescents, 12 to 19-years-old, and caregivers of children under 12-years-old on the acceptibility of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screenings in five pediatric clinics. Method: A constructivist grounded theory approach was utilized. One-on-one semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 44 adolescents and 95 caregivers of children less than 12 years old. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Most participants reported feeling comfortable discussing ACEs with their providers. Some reported that screening helped build trust. Others expressed privacy concerns and did not receive information about the reason for screening. Adolescent patients shared conflicting feelings—of both comfort and discomfort. Caregivers attending to multiple children, foster parents, and monolingual Spanish speakers disclosed unique challenges to ACEs screening. We found no evidence of lasting adverse effects. Discussion: Participants generally found ACEs screenings acceptable. Some adolescents identified benefits from the experience. However, clinics planning to adopt routine ACEs screening should ensure clear messaging on why screening is occurring, anticipate and address privacy concerns, and adopt workflows to discuss screening results.
AB - Introduction: This qualitative research study explored the perspectives of adolescents, 12 to 19-years-old, and caregivers of children under 12-years-old on the acceptibility of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screenings in five pediatric clinics. Method: A constructivist grounded theory approach was utilized. One-on-one semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 44 adolescents and 95 caregivers of children less than 12 years old. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Most participants reported feeling comfortable discussing ACEs with their providers. Some reported that screening helped build trust. Others expressed privacy concerns and did not receive information about the reason for screening. Adolescent patients shared conflicting feelings—of both comfort and discomfort. Caregivers attending to multiple children, foster parents, and monolingual Spanish speakers disclosed unique challenges to ACEs screening. We found no evidence of lasting adverse effects. Discussion: Participants generally found ACEs screenings acceptable. Some adolescents identified benefits from the experience. However, clinics planning to adopt routine ACEs screening should ensure clear messaging on why screening is occurring, anticipate and address privacy concerns, and adopt workflows to discuss screening results.
KW - ACE screening
KW - pediatric
KW - primary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168524982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168524982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pedhc.2023.06.005
DO - 10.1016/j.pedhc.2023.06.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 37589629
AN - SCOPUS:85168524982
SN - 0891-5245
VL - 37
SP - 616
EP - 625
JO - Journal of Pediatric Health Care
JF - Journal of Pediatric Health Care
IS - 6
ER -