TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening
AU - Dyer, Karen E.
AU - Shires, Deirdre A.
AU - Flocke, Susan A.
AU - Hawley, Sarah T.
AU - Jones, Resa M.
AU - Resnicow, Ken
AU - Shin, Yongyun
AU - Lafata, Jennifer Elston
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the participants who took part in these focus groups, as well as Joshua Brown for valuable research coordination and support. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Government, Department of Veterans Affairs, or NIH. This project was funded by Grant No. R01-CA197205 (Lafata, PI) from the National Cancer Institute, NIH (e-Assist: A Post-Visit Patient Portal Tool to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening; ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02798224). The study sponsor played no role in study design. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Introduction: Patient–physician communication about colorectal cancer screening can affect screening use, but discussions often lack information that patients need for informed decision making and seldom address personal preferences or barriers. To address this gap, a series of patient focus groups was conducted to guide the development of an online, interactive decision support program. This article presents findings on patient information needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening after receiving a screening recommendation from a physician, and their perspectives on using electronic patient portals as platforms for health-related decision support. Methods: Primary care patients with recent colonoscopy or stool testing orders were identified via the centralized data repository of a large Midwestern health system. Seven gender-stratified focus groups (N=45 participants) were convened between April and July 2016. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for commonly expressed themes beginning in August 2016. Results: Findings reveal a consistent need for simple and clear information on colorectal cancer screening. Participants desired step-by-step explanations of the colonoscopy procedure and information about bowel preparation options/alternatives. The desired level of additional information varied: some patients wanted to know about and act on test options, whereas others preferred following their physician-recommended testing path. Fears and concerns were prevalent, particularly about colonoscopy, and patients reported challenges getting these concerns and their informational needs addressed. Finally, they expressed consistent support for using the patient portal to gather additional information from their physician. Conclusions: Patient portals may offer an opportunity to build sustainable programs for decision support and assistance that are integrated with clinic workflows and processes.
AB - Introduction: Patient–physician communication about colorectal cancer screening can affect screening use, but discussions often lack information that patients need for informed decision making and seldom address personal preferences or barriers. To address this gap, a series of patient focus groups was conducted to guide the development of an online, interactive decision support program. This article presents findings on patient information needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening after receiving a screening recommendation from a physician, and their perspectives on using electronic patient portals as platforms for health-related decision support. Methods: Primary care patients with recent colonoscopy or stool testing orders were identified via the centralized data repository of a large Midwestern health system. Seven gender-stratified focus groups (N=45 participants) were convened between April and July 2016. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for commonly expressed themes beginning in August 2016. Results: Findings reveal a consistent need for simple and clear information on colorectal cancer screening. Participants desired step-by-step explanations of the colonoscopy procedure and information about bowel preparation options/alternatives. The desired level of additional information varied: some patients wanted to know about and act on test options, whereas others preferred following their physician-recommended testing path. Fears and concerns were prevalent, particularly about colonoscopy, and patients reported challenges getting these concerns and their informational needs addressed. Finally, they expressed consistent support for using the patient portal to gather additional information from their physician. Conclusions: Patient portals may offer an opportunity to build sustainable programs for decision support and assistance that are integrated with clinic workflows and processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058224189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058224189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 30554975
AN - SCOPUS:85058224189
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 56
SP - 271
EP - 280
JO - American journal of preventive medicine
JF - American journal of preventive medicine
IS - 2
ER -