Prehospital disaster triage does not predict pediatric outcomes: Comparing the criteria outcomes tool to three mass-casualty incident triage algorithms

Mark X. Cicero, Genevieve R. Santillanes, Keith P. Cross, Amy H. Kaji, J. Joelle Donofrio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: It remains unclear which mass-casualty incident (MCI) triage tool best predicts outcomes for child disaster victims. Study Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to compare triage outcomes of Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START), modified START, and CareFlight in pediatric patients to an outcomes-based gold standard using the Criteria Outcomes Tool (COT). The secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, under-triage, over-triage, and overall accuracy at each level for each MCI triage algorithm. Methods: Singleton trauma patients under 16 years of age with complete prehospital, emergency department (ED), and in-patient data were identified in the 2007-2009 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). The COT outcomes and procedures were translated into ICD-9 procedure codes with added timing criteria. Gold standard triage levels were assigned using the COT based on outcomes, including mortality, injury type, admission to the hospital, and surgical procedures. Comparison triage levels were determined based on algorithmic depictions of the three MCI triage tools. Results: A total of 31,093 patients with complete data were identified from the NTDB. The COT was applied to these patients, and the breakdown of gold standard triage levels, based on their actual clinical outcomes, was: 17,333 (55.7%) GREEN; 11,587 (37.3%) YELLOW; 1,572 (5.1%) RED; and 601 (1.9%) BLACK. CareFlight had the best sensitivity for predicting COT outcomes for BLACK (83% [95% confidence interval, 80%-86%]) and GREEN patients (79% [95% CI, 79%-80%]) and the best specificity for RED patients (89% [95% CI, 89%-90%]). Conclusion: Among three prehospital MCI triage tools, CareFlight had the best performance for correlating with outcomes in the COT. Overall, none of three tools had good test characteristics for predicting pediatric patient needs for surgical procedures or hospital admission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-510
Number of pages8
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 16 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • child
  • injuries
  • mass-casualty incidents
  • triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prehospital disaster triage does not predict pediatric outcomes: Comparing the criteria outcomes tool to three mass-casualty incident triage algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this