TY - JOUR
T1 - Recurrence of Melanoma After a Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy
T2 - Predictors and Impact of Recurrence Site on Survival
AU - Thomas, Daniel C.
AU - Han, Gang
AU - Leong, Stanley P.
AU - Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
AU - Vetto, John
AU - Pockaj, Barbara
AU - White, Richard L.
AU - Faries, Mark B.
AU - Schneebaum, Schlomo
AU - Mozzillo, Nicola
AU - Charney, Kim J.
AU - Sondak, Vernon K.
AU - Messina, Jane L.
AU - Zager, Jonathan S.
AU - Han, Dale
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2019/7/15
Y1 - 2019/7/15
N2 - Background: Factors that predict melanoma recurrence after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are not well-defined. We evaluated melanoma recurrence patterns, factors prognostic for recurrence, and the impact of recurrence on outcomes after a negative SLNB. Methods: The Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group database was evaluated from 1996 to 2016 for negative SLNB melanoma patients. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with recurrence, overall survival (OS), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Results: Median follow-up was 32.1 months. Recurrences developed in 558 of 5351 negative SLN patients (10.4%). First-site of recurrence included a local or in-transit recurrence (LITR) in 221 cases (4.1%), nodal recurrence (NR) in 109 cases (2%), and distant recurrence (DR) in 220 cases (4.1%). On multivariable analysis, age, thickness, head/neck or lower extremity primary, and microsatellitosis significantly predicted for an LITR as first-site. Having an LITR as first-site significantly predicted for a subsequent NR and DR, and significantly predicted for worse OS and MSS. Furthermore, thickness and head/neck or lower extremity primary significantly predicted for an NR as first-site, while a prior LITR significantly predicted for a subsequent NR. Factors significantly predictive for a DR included thickness, head/neck or trunk primary, ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion. Patients with any type of locoregional recurrence were at higher risk for a DR. Conclusions: Recurrences occur in 10.4% of negative SLN patients, with LITR and DR being the most common types. Importantly, having an LITR significantly predicts for a subsequent NR and DR, and is prognostic for worse survival after a negative SLNB.
AB - Background: Factors that predict melanoma recurrence after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are not well-defined. We evaluated melanoma recurrence patterns, factors prognostic for recurrence, and the impact of recurrence on outcomes after a negative SLNB. Methods: The Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group database was evaluated from 1996 to 2016 for negative SLNB melanoma patients. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with recurrence, overall survival (OS), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Results: Median follow-up was 32.1 months. Recurrences developed in 558 of 5351 negative SLN patients (10.4%). First-site of recurrence included a local or in-transit recurrence (LITR) in 221 cases (4.1%), nodal recurrence (NR) in 109 cases (2%), and distant recurrence (DR) in 220 cases (4.1%). On multivariable analysis, age, thickness, head/neck or lower extremity primary, and microsatellitosis significantly predicted for an LITR as first-site. Having an LITR as first-site significantly predicted for a subsequent NR and DR, and significantly predicted for worse OS and MSS. Furthermore, thickness and head/neck or lower extremity primary significantly predicted for an NR as first-site, while a prior LITR significantly predicted for a subsequent NR. Factors significantly predictive for a DR included thickness, head/neck or trunk primary, ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion. Patients with any type of locoregional recurrence were at higher risk for a DR. Conclusions: Recurrences occur in 10.4% of negative SLN patients, with LITR and DR being the most common types. Importantly, having an LITR significantly predicts for a subsequent NR and DR, and is prognostic for worse survival after a negative SLNB.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064645504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064645504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-019-07369-w
DO - 10.1245/s10434-019-07369-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 31011906
AN - SCOPUS:85064645504
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 26
SP - 2254
EP - 2262
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -