TY - JOUR
T1 - Repair strength in simulated restorations of methacrylate- or silorane-based composite resins
AU - Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek
AU - Marinho, Tatiane
AU - Bacchi, Atais
AU - Caldas, Ricardo Armini
AU - Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro
AU - Pfeifer, Carmem Silvia
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank to CNPq/UNICAMP/PIBIC program to the support for the development of this research at Piracicaba Dental School, Universidade de Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - The study verified the bond strength in simulated dental restorations of siloraneor methacrylate-based composites repaired with methacrylate-based composite. Methacrylate- (P60) or silorane-based (P90) composites were used associated with adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2). Twenty-four hemi-hourglass-shaped samples were repaired with each composite (n=12). Samples were divided according to groups: G1= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2+ P60; G2= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling; G3= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60; and G4= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling. G1 and G3 were submitted to tensile test 24 h after repair procedure, and G2 and G4 after submitted to 5,000 thermocycles at 5 and 55 °C for 30 s in each bath. Tensile bond strength test was accomplished in an universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Sample failure pattern (adhesive, cohesive in resin or mixed) was evaluated by stereomicroscope at 30× and images were obtained in SEM. Bond strength values of methacrylate-based composite samples repaired with methacrylate-based composite (G1 and G2) were greater than for silorane-based samples (G3 and G4). Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values for both composites. All groups showed predominance of adhesive failures and no cohesive failure in composite resin was observed. In conclusion, higher bond strength values were observed in methacrylate-based resin samples and greater percentage of adhesive failures in silorane-based resin samples, both composites repaired with methacrylate-based resin.
AB - The study verified the bond strength in simulated dental restorations of siloraneor methacrylate-based composites repaired with methacrylate-based composite. Methacrylate- (P60) or silorane-based (P90) composites were used associated with adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2). Twenty-four hemi-hourglass-shaped samples were repaired with each composite (n=12). Samples were divided according to groups: G1= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2+ P60; G2= P60 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling; G3= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60; and G4= P90 + Adper Single Bond 2 + P60 + thermocycling. G1 and G3 were submitted to tensile test 24 h after repair procedure, and G2 and G4 after submitted to 5,000 thermocycles at 5 and 55 °C for 30 s in each bath. Tensile bond strength test was accomplished in an universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Sample failure pattern (adhesive, cohesive in resin or mixed) was evaluated by stereomicroscope at 30× and images were obtained in SEM. Bond strength values of methacrylate-based composite samples repaired with methacrylate-based composite (G1 and G2) were greater than for silorane-based samples (G3 and G4). Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values for both composites. All groups showed predominance of adhesive failures and no cohesive failure in composite resin was observed. In conclusion, higher bond strength values were observed in methacrylate-based resin samples and greater percentage of adhesive failures in silorane-based resin samples, both composites repaired with methacrylate-based resin.
KW - Bond strength
KW - Dental composite
KW - Methacrylate
KW - Repair
KW - Silorane
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988310652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988310652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/0103-6440201600730
DO - 10.1590/0103-6440201600730
M3 - Article
C2 - 27652712
AN - SCOPUS:84988310652
SN - 0103-6440
VL - 27
SP - 463
EP - 467
JO - Brazilian Dental Journal
JF - Brazilian Dental Journal
IS - 4
ER -