Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No harm done, but they can do better

Kim E. Saunders; William E. Dale

doi:10.1038/laban.1234

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No harm done, but they can do better

Department of Comparative Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	88
Number of pages	1
Journal	Lab animal
Volume	46
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1234
State	Published - Mar 22 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Animal Science and Zoology
General Veterinary

Access to Document

10.1038/laban.1234

Cite this

@article{cd70ba179713490ea9580d92531fe8e2,

title = "Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No harm done, but they can do better",

author = "Saunders, {Kim E.} and Dale, {William E.}",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1038/laban.1234",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "46",

pages = "88",

journal = "Lab animal",

issn = "0093-7355",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Protocol Review Scenario

T2 - No harm done, but they can do better

AU - Saunders, Kim E.

AU - Dale, William E.

PY - 2017/3/22

Y1 - 2017/3/22

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016172666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016172666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/laban.1234

DO - 10.1038/laban.1234

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28328871

AN - SCOPUS:85016172666

SN - 0093-7355

VL - 46

SP - 88

JO - Lab animal

JF - Lab animal

IS - 4

ER -

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No harm done, but they can do better

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this