Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement

Bo Eklöf, Robert B. Rutherford, John J. Bergan, Patrick H. Carpentier, Peter Gloviczki, Robert L. Kistner, Mark H. Meissner, Gregory L. Moneta, Kenneth Myers, Frank T. Padberg, Michel Perrin, C. Vaughan Ruckley, Philip Coleridge Smith, Thomas W. Wakefield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1607 Scopus citations

Abstract

The CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders (CVD) was developed in 1994 by an international ad hoc committee of the American Venous Forum, endorsed by the Society for Vascular Surgery, and incorporated into "Reporting Standards in Venous Disease" in 1995. Today most published clinical papers on CVD use all or portions of CEAP. Rather than have it stand as a static classification system, an ad hoc committee of the American Venous Forum, working with an international liaison committee, has recommended a number of practical changes, detailed in this consensus report. These include refinement of several definitions used in describing CVD; refinement of the C classes of CEAP; addition of the descriptor n (no venous abnormality identified); elaboration of the date of classification and level of investigation; and as a simpler alternative to the full (advanced) CEAP classification, introduction of a basic CEAP version. It is important to stress that CEAP is a descriptive classification, whereas venous severity scoring and quality of life scores are instruments for longitudinal research to assess outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1248-1252
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of vascular surgery
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this