Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: A multivariable analysis

Barbara Bielawska, Andrew G. Day, David A. Lieberman, Lawrence C. Hookey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations


Background & Aims: Bowel perforation is a rare but serious complication of colonoscopy. Its prevalence is increasing with the rapidly growing volume of procedures performed. Although colonoscopies have been performed for decades, the risk factors for perforation are not completely understood. We investigated risk factors for perforation during colonoscopy by assessing variables that included sedation type and endoscopist specialty and level of training. Methods: We performed a retrospective multivariate analysis of risk factors for early perforation (occurring at any point during the colonoscopy but recognized during or immediately after the procedure) in adult patients by using the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database. Risk factors were determined from published articles. Additional variables assessed included endoscopist specialty and years of experience, trainee involvement, and sedation with propofol. Results: We identified 192 perforation events during 1,144,900 colonoscopies from 85 centers entered into the database from January 2000-March 2011. On multivariate analysis, increasing age, American Society of Anesthesia class, female sex, hospital setting, any therapy, and polyps >10 mm were significantly associated with increased risk of early perforation. Colonoscopies performed by surgeons and endoscopists of unknown specialty had higher rates of perforation than those performed by gastroenterologists (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.08). Propofol sedation did not significantly affect risk for perforation. Conclusions: In addition to previously established risk factors, non-gastroenterologist specialty was found to affect risk for perforations detected during or immediately after colonoscopy. This finding could result from differences in volume and style of endoscopy training. Further investigation into these observed associations is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-92
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2014


  • ASA Classification
  • Endoscopy Training
  • GI
  • Intestine
  • Quality Control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: A multivariable analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this