Risk Factors for Reoperation to Promote Union in 1111 Distal Femur Fractures

Christopher Lee, Dane Brodke, Nathan O'Hara, Sai Devana, Adolfo Hernandez, Cynthia Burke, Jayesh Gupta, Natasha McKibben, Robert O'Toole, John Morellato, Hunter Gillon, Murphy Walters, Colby Barber, Paul Perdue, Graham Dekeyser, Lillia Steffenson, Lucas Marchand, Marshall James Fairres, Loren Black, Zachary WorkingErika Roddy, Ashraf El Naga, Matthew Hogue, Trevor Gulbrandsen, Omar Atassi, Thomas Mitchell, Stephen Shymon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives:To identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for reoperation to promote union after distal femur fracture.Design:Multicenter retrospective cohort study.Setting:Ten Level-I trauma centers.Patients/Participants:Patients with OTA/AO 33A or C distal femur fractures (n = 1111).Intervention:Surgical fixation of distal femur fracture. Fixation constructs were classified as lateral plate, dual plate, nail, or nail plate combination.Main Outcome Measurements:The outcome of interest was unplanned reoperation to promote union.Results:There was an 11% (121/1111) rate of unplanned reoperation to promote union. In the multivariate analysis, predictive factors included body mass index [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.32; P < 0.01], intra-articular fracture (OR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.45; P = 0.04), type III open injury (OR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.41-3.72; P < 0.01), the presence of medial comminution (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14-3.06; P = 0.01), and medial translation on postoperative radiographs (OR = 1.23 per one 10th of condylar width; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48; P = 0.03). Construct type was not significantly predictive.Conclusions:Eleven percent of distal femur fractures underwent unplanned reoperation to promote union. Body mass index, intra-articular fracture, type III open injury, medial comminution, and medial translation on postoperative radiographs were predictive factors. Construct type was not associated with unplanned reoperation; however, this conclusion was limited by small numbers in the dual plate and nail plate groups.Level of Evidence:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-174
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of orthopaedic trauma
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2023

Keywords

  • distal femur
  • intramedullary nail
  • multicenter
  • plate fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Factors for Reoperation to Promote Union in 1111 Distal Femur Fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this