TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder perspectives on education in aortic dissection
AU - Aortic Dissection Collaborative
AU - Talutis, Stephanie D.
AU - Woo, Karen
AU - Watson, Jacob
AU - Goldsborough, Earl
AU - Masciale, Eileen
AU - Case, Melanie
AU - Cotter, Novelett E.
AU - David, Carmen C.
AU - Fasano, Mark
AU - Goldenberg, Richard
AU - Howitt, Jake
AU - Söderlund, Timo T.
AU - Trotter, Debra
AU - Rabin, Asaf
AU - Boehler-Tatman, Mattie
AU - Russo, Melissa L.
AU - Drudi, Laura Marie
AU - Marks, Laura L.
AU - Yousif, Maisoon D.
AU - Hoffstaetter, Tabea
AU - Taubenfeld, Ella
AU - Vemulapalli, Sreekanth
AU - Campos, Chrisanne S.
AU - Rusche, Lindsey
AU - Pena, Robert C.F.
AU - Mussa, Firas F.
AU - MacCarrick, Gretchen
AU - Goldsborough, Earl
AU - Samuel, Christeen
AU - Xu, Lillian
AU - Mouawad, Nicolas J.
AU - Yassa, Eanas S.
AU - Teng, Xiaoyi
AU - Politano, Amani
AU - Teindl, Jesse
AU - Bloom, Lara
AU - Gluck, Rebecca
AU - O'Neal, Meredith Ford
AU - Grima, Josephine
AU - Masciale, Eileen
AU - Ota, Takeyoshi
AU - Wright, Katelyn
AU - Hakim, Alan J.
AU - Owens, Gareth
AU - Arnaoutakis, George J.
AU - Judelson, Dejah
AU - D'Oria, Mario
AU - Rio-Sola, Lurdes del
AU - Ajalat, Mark
AU - Shalhub, Sherene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The Aortic Dissection (AD) Collaborative was established to evaluate patient-centered research priorities in AD. Education was identified as a topic of interest by the stakeholders. The AD Collaborative Education Working Group evaluated existing educational resources and identified areas amenable to comparative effectiveness research. The most important positive qualities of available AD education resources are ease of use, diversity of representation, accessibility, and organization. The most important negative qualities of these resources are non–patient-centered language, promotional themes, and those with limited applicability and accessibility. Through a series of focus groups, the Working Group identified target audiences for AD education and educational material content and critically assessed and prioritized barriers to effective AD education. Both the target audiences and the barriers include clinicians and patients themselves. The Working Group defined initiatives to overcome barriers, to include a comprehensive, universally agreed on AD resource that is updated in real time and making education accessible to all relevant target audiences. The Working Group then prioritized needs for comparative effectiveness research in AD education and determined that clinician education is the top priority for future efforts. The Working Group determined that assessment and evaluation of specific and appropriate screening strategies is the second most important priority. Finally, the Working Group identified patient education as the third most important priority, specifically determining how patients and their support groups learn best, the ideal strategies for information dissemination, and methods of assessing understanding and satisfaction with the education process.
AB - The Aortic Dissection (AD) Collaborative was established to evaluate patient-centered research priorities in AD. Education was identified as a topic of interest by the stakeholders. The AD Collaborative Education Working Group evaluated existing educational resources and identified areas amenable to comparative effectiveness research. The most important positive qualities of available AD education resources are ease of use, diversity of representation, accessibility, and organization. The most important negative qualities of these resources are non–patient-centered language, promotional themes, and those with limited applicability and accessibility. Through a series of focus groups, the Working Group identified target audiences for AD education and educational material content and critically assessed and prioritized barriers to effective AD education. Both the target audiences and the barriers include clinicians and patients themselves. The Working Group defined initiatives to overcome barriers, to include a comprehensive, universally agreed on AD resource that is updated in real time and making education accessible to all relevant target audiences. The Working Group then prioritized needs for comparative effectiveness research in AD education and determined that clinician education is the top priority for future efforts. The Working Group determined that assessment and evaluation of specific and appropriate screening strategies is the second most important priority. Finally, the Working Group identified patient education as the third most important priority, specifically determining how patients and their support groups learn best, the ideal strategies for information dissemination, and methods of assessing understanding and satisfaction with the education process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126344371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126344371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.02.002
DO - 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35501043
AN - SCOPUS:85126344371
SN - 0895-7967
VL - 35
SP - 69
EP - 77
JO - Seminars in Vascular Surgery
JF - Seminars in Vascular Surgery
IS - 1
ER -