Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Jennifer Listgarten, Andrew Emili

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

247 Scopus citations

Abstract

The combined method of LC-MS/MS is increasingly being used to explore differences in the proteomic composition of complex biological systems. The reliability and utility of such comparative protein expression profiling studies is critically dependent on an accurate and rigorous assessment of quantitative changes in the relative abundance of the myriad of proteins typically present in a biological sample such as blood or tissue. In this review, we provide an overview of key statistical and computational issues relevant to bottom-up shotgun global proteomic analysis, with an emphasis on methods that can be applied to improve the dependability of biological inferences drawn from large proteomic datasets. Focusing on a start-to-finish approach, we address the following topics: 1) low-level data processing steps, such as formation of a data matrix, filtering, and baseline subtraction to minimize noise, 2) mid-level processing steps, such as data normalization, alignment in time, peak detection, peak quantification, peak matching, and error models, to facilitate profile comparisons; and, 3) high-level processing steps such as sample classification and biomarker discovery, and related topics such as significance testing, multiple testing, and choice of feature space. We report on approaches that have recently been developed for these steps, discussing their merits and limitations, and propose areas deserving of further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-434
Number of pages16
JournalMolecular and Cellular Proteomics
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this