Supportive Oncology Care at Home Intervention for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Ryan D. Nipp, Eva Gaufberg, Charu Vyas, Chinenye Azoba, Carolyn L. Qian, Jordon Jaggers, Colin D. Weekes, Jill N. Allen, Eric J. Roeland, Aparna R. Parikh, Laurie Miller, Jennifer Y. Wo, Melissa Hennessey Smith, Patricia M.C. Brown, Eliza Shulman, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, Alec C. Kimmelman, David Ting, Theodore S. Hong, Joseph A. GreerDavid P. Ryan, Jennifer S. Temel, Areej El-Jawahri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE:We sought to determine the feasibility of delivering a Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention among patients with pancreatic cancer.METHODS:We prospectively enrolled patients with pancreatic cancer from a parent trial of neoadjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX). The intervention entailed (1) remote monitoring of patient-reported symptoms, vital signs, and body weight; (2) a hospital-at-home care model; and (3) structured communication with the oncology team. We defined the intervention as feasible if ≥ 60% of patients enrolled in the study and ≥ 60% completed the daily assessments within the first 2-weeks of enrollment. We determined rates of treatment delays, urgent clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations among those who did (n = 20) and did not (n = 24) receive Supportive Oncology Care at Home from the parent trial.RESULTS:From January 2019 to September 2020, we enrolled 80.8% (21/26) of potentially eligible patients. One patient became ineligible following consent because of moving out of state, resulting in 20 participants (median age = 67 years). In the first 2 weeks of enrollment, 65.0% of participants completed all daily assessments. Overall, patients reported 96.1% of daily symptoms, 96.1% of daily vital signs, and 92.5% of weekly body weights. Patients receiving the intervention had lower rates of treatment delays (55.0% v 75.0%), urgent clinic visits (10.0% v 25.0%), and emergency department visits/hospitalizations (45.0% v 62.5%) compared with those not receiving the intervention from the same parent trial.CONCLUSION:Findings demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of a Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention. Future work will investigate the efficacy of this intervention for decreasing health care use and improving patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E1587-E1593
JournalJCO Oncology Practice
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Health Policy
  • Oncology(nursing)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supportive Oncology Care at Home Intervention for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this