TY - JOUR
T1 - Technetium Stabilization in Low-Solubility Sulfide Phases
T2 - A Review
AU - Pearce, Carolyn I.
AU - Icenhower, Jonathan P.
AU - Asmussen, R. Matthew
AU - Tratnyek, Paul G.
AU - Rosso, Kevin M.
AU - Lukens, Wayne W.
AU - Qafoku, Nikolla P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. Specifically, we thank David Swanberg, Elvie Brown, and Ridha Mabrouki from WRPS. We acknowledge Sarah Saslow for careful review of the manuscript and Mateusz Dembowski for generating the structures in Figure 9. W.W.L. acknowledges support from the U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (OBES), Chemical Sciences, Biosciences, and Geosciences Division (CSGB), Heavy Element Chemistry Program at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. P.G.T.’s work in this area was supported by the Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program of the U.S. DOE, Award No. DE-SC0001376. K.M.R. acknowledges support from the U.S. DOE, Office of Science, OBES, CSGB Division, through its Geosciences program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). C.I.P., N.P.Q., and R.M.A. acknowledge support from the Interfacial Geochemistry Team, Subsurface Science & Technology Group at PNNL. PNNL is operated by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC (WRPS) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management. Specifically, we thank David Swanberg Elvie Brown, and Ridha Mabrouki from WRPS. We acknowledge Sarah Saslow for careful review of the manuscript and Mateusz Dembowski for generating the structures in Figure 9. W.W.L. acknowledges support from the U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (OBES), Chemical Sciences, Biosciences, and Geosciences Division (CSGB), Heavy Element Chemistry Program at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. P.G.T.'s work in this area was supported by the Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program of the U.S. DOE Award No. DE-SC0001376. K.M.R. acknowledges support from the U.S. DOE, Office of Science, OBES, CSGB Division, through its Geosciences program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). C.I.P., N.P.Q. and R.M.A. acknowledge support from the Interfacial Geochemistry Team Subsurface Science & Technology Group at PNNL. PNNL is operated by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2018/6/21
Y1 - 2018/6/21
N2 - Technetium contamination remains a major environmental problem at nuclear reprocessing sites, e.g., the Hanford Site, Washington, USA. At these sites, Tc is present in liquid waste destined for immobilization in a waste form or has been released into the subsurface environment. The high environmental risk associated with Tc is due to its long half-life (214 000 years) and the mobility of the oxidized anionic species Tc(VII)O4 -. Under reducing conditions, TcO4 - is readily reduced to Tc(IV), which commonly exists as a relatively insoluble and therefore immobile, hydrous Tc-oxide (TcO2·nH2O). The stability of Tc(IV) sequestered as solid phases depends on the solubility of the solid and susceptibility to reoxidation to TcO4 -, which in turn depend on the (biogeo)chemical conditions of the environment and/or nuclear waste streams. Unfortunately, the solubility of crystalline TcO2 or amorphous TcO2·H2O is still above the maximum contaminant level (MCL) established by the U.S. EPA (900 pCi/L), and the kinetics of TcO2 oxidative dissolution can be on the order of days to years. In addition to oxygen, sulfur can form complexes that significantly affect the adsorption, solubility, and reoxidation potential of Tc, especially Tc(IV). The principal technetium sulfides are TcS2 and Tc2S7, but much less is known about the mechanisms of formation, stabilization, and reoxidation of Tc-sulfides. A common assumption is that sulfides are less soluble than their oxyhydrous counterparts. Determination of the molecular structure of Tc2S7 in particular has been hampered by the propensity of this phase to precipitate as an amorphous substance. Recent work indicates that the oxidation state of Tc in Tc2S7 is Tc(IV), in apparent contradiction to its nominal stoichiometry. Technetium is relatively immobile in reduced sediments and soils, but in many cases the exact sink for Tc has not been identified. Experiments and modeling have demonstrated that both abiotic and biologic mechanisms can exert strong controls on Tc mobility and that Tc binding or uptake into sulfide phases can occur. These and similar investigations also show that extended exposure to oxidizing conditions results in transformation of sulfide-stabilized Tc(IV) to a Tc(IV)O2-like phase without formation of measurable dissolved TcO4 -, suggesting a solid-state transformation in which Tc(IV)-associated sulfide is preferentially oxidized before the Tc(IV) cation. This transformation of Tc(IV)-sulfides to Tc(IV)-oxides may be the main process that limits remobilization of Tc as Tc(VII)O4 -. The efficacy of the final waste form to retain Tc also strongly depends on the ability of oxidizing species to enter the waste and convert Tc(IV) to Tc(VII). Many waste form designs are reducing (e.g., cementitious waste forms such as salt stone) and, therefore, attempt to restrict access of oxidizing species such that diffusion is the rate-limiting step in remobilization of Tc.
AB - Technetium contamination remains a major environmental problem at nuclear reprocessing sites, e.g., the Hanford Site, Washington, USA. At these sites, Tc is present in liquid waste destined for immobilization in a waste form or has been released into the subsurface environment. The high environmental risk associated with Tc is due to its long half-life (214 000 years) and the mobility of the oxidized anionic species Tc(VII)O4 -. Under reducing conditions, TcO4 - is readily reduced to Tc(IV), which commonly exists as a relatively insoluble and therefore immobile, hydrous Tc-oxide (TcO2·nH2O). The stability of Tc(IV) sequestered as solid phases depends on the solubility of the solid and susceptibility to reoxidation to TcO4 -, which in turn depend on the (biogeo)chemical conditions of the environment and/or nuclear waste streams. Unfortunately, the solubility of crystalline TcO2 or amorphous TcO2·H2O is still above the maximum contaminant level (MCL) established by the U.S. EPA (900 pCi/L), and the kinetics of TcO2 oxidative dissolution can be on the order of days to years. In addition to oxygen, sulfur can form complexes that significantly affect the adsorption, solubility, and reoxidation potential of Tc, especially Tc(IV). The principal technetium sulfides are TcS2 and Tc2S7, but much less is known about the mechanisms of formation, stabilization, and reoxidation of Tc-sulfides. A common assumption is that sulfides are less soluble than their oxyhydrous counterparts. Determination of the molecular structure of Tc2S7 in particular has been hampered by the propensity of this phase to precipitate as an amorphous substance. Recent work indicates that the oxidation state of Tc in Tc2S7 is Tc(IV), in apparent contradiction to its nominal stoichiometry. Technetium is relatively immobile in reduced sediments and soils, but in many cases the exact sink for Tc has not been identified. Experiments and modeling have demonstrated that both abiotic and biologic mechanisms can exert strong controls on Tc mobility and that Tc binding or uptake into sulfide phases can occur. These and similar investigations also show that extended exposure to oxidizing conditions results in transformation of sulfide-stabilized Tc(IV) to a Tc(IV)O2-like phase without formation of measurable dissolved TcO4 -, suggesting a solid-state transformation in which Tc(IV)-associated sulfide is preferentially oxidized before the Tc(IV) cation. This transformation of Tc(IV)-sulfides to Tc(IV)-oxides may be the main process that limits remobilization of Tc as Tc(VII)O4 -. The efficacy of the final waste form to retain Tc also strongly depends on the ability of oxidizing species to enter the waste and convert Tc(IV) to Tc(VII). Many waste form designs are reducing (e.g., cementitious waste forms such as salt stone) and, therefore, attempt to restrict access of oxidizing species such that diffusion is the rate-limiting step in remobilization of Tc.
KW - X-ray absorption spectroscopy
KW - cementitious waste forms
KW - environmental mobility
KW - radioactive waste
KW - redox reactivity
KW - technetium sulfide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047091412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047091412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00015
DO - 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00015
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85047091412
SN - 2472-3452
VL - 2
SP - 532
EP - 547
JO - ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
JF - ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
IS - 6
ER -