The association of federal Medicaid abortion funding restrictions with adverse obstetric outcomes among United States Medicaid recipients

Maria I. Rodriguez, Thomas H.A. Meath, Ashley Daly, Kelsey Watson, K. John McConnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: We examine the association of the Hyde Amendment with obstetrical outcomes in a national Medicaid population. Study design: We conducted a national study of Medicaid-funded abortions to determine the association of restrictions on adolescent, preterm, low-birth weight, and short interpregnancy interval births using administrative data. Results: States that restricted coverage for abortion had a higher median rate of adolescent (10.2%; vs 7.4%; p-value < 0.001), preterm (11.4%; vs 10.1%; p < 0.001), short interpregnancy interval, (13.0% vs 9.6%; p < 0.001), and low birth weight births (10.2% vs 8.7%; p = 0.003) than states where Medicaid provided comprehensive coverage. Conclusions: Restricting federal funds for abortion is associated with adverse outcomes. Implications: When Medicaid does not provide comprehensive coverage for abortion care, few abortions are provided and higher rates of adverse obstetrical outcomes are noted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number110116
JournalContraception
Volume126
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Adolescent birth rates
  • Hyde Amendment
  • Preterm birth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The association of federal Medicaid abortion funding restrictions with adverse obstetric outcomes among United States Medicaid recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this