TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of grenz ray therapy for chronic dermatoses of the hands and feet
AU - Simpson, Brenda M.
AU - Foster, Shannon K.
AU - Chapman, Cindi N.
AU - Simpson, Eric L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by the American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. Results: Most patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65%Y80%) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66% of patients (95% CI, 57%Y74%), with 18 patients (23%; 95% CI, 15%Y33%) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63%; 95% CI, 52%Y72%) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. Conclusions: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.
AB - Background: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used for inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic diseases for over 100 years. Its use is declining, possibly because of the difficulties maintaining radiation certification and insurance coverage. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GRT in chronic inflammatory dermatoses of the hands and feet. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated with GRT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2006 to 2009. Candidates identified for the study were then mailed questionnaires to supplement data acquired from chart review. Results: Most patients (73%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65%Y80%) experienced at least moderate improvement. This improvement persisted for at least 1 month in 66% of patients (95% CI, 57%Y74%), with 18 patients (23%; 95% CI, 15%Y33%) clear for over 1 year. Minimal adverse effects were reported, and most patients (63%; 95% CI, 52%Y72%) stated that they would repeat GRT if available. Conclusions: Grenz ray therapy seems to be a safe and effective modality for chronic hand and foot dermatoses with some patients experiencing prolonged remissions. Grenz ray therapy, when available, should be considered before the use of systemic agents, which are often associated with higher costs and potential toxicities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925884222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925884222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DER.0000000000000050
DO - 10.1097/DER.0000000000000050
M3 - Article
C2 - 25000231
AN - SCOPUS:84925884222
SN - 1710-3568
VL - 25
SP - 205
EP - 208
JO - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
JF - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
IS - 4
ER -