The Role of Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

Davin C. Ashraf, Oluwatobi O. Idowu, Qinyun Wang, Tak YeEun, Thomas S. Copperman, Sombat Tanaboonyawat, Benjamin F. Arnold, Catherine E. Oldenburg, M. Reza Vagefi, Robert C. Kersten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The usefulness of topical antibiotic prophylaxis for routine oculofacial plastic surgery is not well established. Given concerns such as contact dermatitis, antibiotic resistance, and healthcare costs in conjunction with a low baseline rate of surgical site infections, the investigators sought to determine the frequency of infection with and without the use of topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Design: Randomized, controlled, unmasked clinical trial. Participants: Adult patients undergoing routine periocular surgery without prior history of periocular surgical site infection, need for perioperative oral or parenteral antibiotics, or allergy to all study medications. Methods: Participants were randomized before surgery to receive either antibiotic or placebo (mineral oil and petrolatum-based) ointment after surgery. Outcomes were measured at the first postoperative visit. The 2-tailed Fisher exact test was used to compare outcomes between groups. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of surgical site infections. The secondary outcomes included stratification of infections by patient risk characteristics, incidence of allergic contact dermatitis, and incidence of wound complications. Results: Four hundred one participants were enrolled and randomized, and 13 participants did not proceed with surgery or were lost to follow-up. High-risk features for infection were identified in 24% of the placebo group and 21% of the antibiotic group. Surgical site infections were more common in the placebo group (2.7% vs. 0.0%; P = 0.025). The rate of contact dermatitis was similar (0.5% vs. 0.5%; P = 1.00), as was the rate of wound dehiscence (2.7% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.77). Among the placebo group, the incidence of infections in the low- and high-risk participants was 2.9% and 2.2%, respectively. Infections were treated with oral or topical antibiotics and resolved without complication, except in 1 patient who required 2 subsequent surgeries to address the sequelae. Conclusions: After routine oculofacial plastic surgery, patients treated with a topical antibiotic ointment showed a lower risk of surgical site infection compared with patients treated with a nonantibiotic ointment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1747-1754
Number of pages8
JournalOphthalmology
Volume127
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • antibiotic
  • contact dermatitis
  • eyelid
  • oculofacial plastic
  • oculoplastic
  • ointment
  • periocular
  • prophylaxis
  • surgery
  • surgical site infection
  • wound dehiscence
  • wound infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this