Toward rational use of repeat imaging in children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries

Gabrielle W. Johnson, Jacob K. Greenberg, Andrew T. Hale, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Madelyn Hill, Ahmed Belal, Shawyon Baygani, Randi E. Foraker, Christopher R. Carpenter, Yan Yan, Laurie L. Ackerman, Corina Noje, Eric Jackson, Erin C. Burns, Christina M. Sayama, Nathan R. Selden, Shobhan Vachhrajani, Chevis N. Shannon, Nathan Kuppermann, David D. Limbrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Limited evidence exists on the utility of repeat neuroimaging in children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and intracranial injuries (ICIs). Here, the authors identified factors associated with repeat neuroimaging and predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgical intervention. METHODS The authors performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of children at four centers of the Pediatric TBI Research Consortium. All patients were ≤ 18 years and presented within 24 hours of injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15 and evidence of ICI on neuroimaging. The outcomes of interest were 1) whether patients underwent repeat neuroimaging during index admission, and 2) a composite outcome of progression of previously identified hemorrhage ≥ 25% and/or repeat imaging as an indication for subsequent neurosurgical intervention. The authors performed multivariable logistic regression and report odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS A total of 1324 patients met inclusion criteria; 41.3% of patients underwent repeat imaging. Repeat imaging was associated with clinical change in 4.8% of patients; the remainder of the imaging tests were for routine surveillance (90.9%) or of unclear prompting (4.4%). In 2.6% of patients, repeat imaging findings were reported as an indication for neurosurgical intervention. While many factors were associated with repeat neuroimaging, only epidural hematoma (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.22-7.15), posttraumatic seizures (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.22-7.41), and age ≥ 2 years (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.16-4.36) were significant predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgery. Of patients without any of these risk factors, none underwent neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Repeat neuroimaging was commonly used but uncommonly associated with clinical deterioration. Although several factors were associated with repeat neuroimaging, only posttraumatic seizures, age ≥ 2 years, and epidural hematoma were significant predictors of hemorrhage progression and/or neurosurgery. These results provide the foundation for evidence-based repeat neuroimaging practices in children with mTBI and ICI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-34
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Keywords

  • emergency medicine
  • imaging overuse
  • mild traumatic brain injury
  • repeat imaging
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward rational use of repeat imaging in children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this